Case Law W. Hills Farms, LLC v. Classicstar Farms, Inc. (In re Classicstar Mare Lease Litig.)

W. Hills Farms, LLC v. Classicstar Farms, Inc. (In re Classicstar Mare Lease Litig.)

Document Cited Authorities (62) Cited in (90) Related

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

ARGUED:Kannon K. Shanmugam, Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellants. Barry D. Hunter, Frost Brown Todd, Lexington, Kentucky, for Appellees in 12–5467 and 12–5475 ON BRIEF:Kannon K. Shanmugam, Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellants. Barry D. Hunter, Frost Brown Todd, Lexington, Kentucky, for Appellees in 12–5467 and 12–5475.

Before: MERRITT, CLAY, and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges.

CLAY, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which GRIFFIN, J., joined. MERRITT, J. (pp. 497–501), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.

OPINION

CLAY, Circuit Judge.

This case arises from the fraudulent operation of an investment vehicle called the Mare Lease Program. Plaintiffs, a group of investors, alleged that Defendants violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c), by convincing them to invest in the Mare Lease Program and related entities in order to take advantage of various tax deductions. Little did Plaintiffs know that the assets which formed the basis of the touted tax deductions were dramatically undervalued and, in some cases, wholly fictitious. After extensive discovery, Plaintiffs moved for summary judgment on their RICO claim as well as parallel state-law fraud and breach of contract claims. The district court granted summary judgment to Plaintiffs on each claim and awarded damages of approximately $49.4 million and prejudgment interest in excess of $15.6 million. Because we agree that the record reflects no genuine dispute over any material facts, we AFFIRM the district court's grant of summary judgment.

BACKGROUND
A. The Mare Lease Program

In 1990, David Plummer created the Mare Lease Program to enable investors to participate in his horse-breeding business while taking advantage of the sizable tax benefits associated with raising horses. Plummer, who operated the Mare Lease Program through a company named New Classic Breeders, LLC, was a nationally recognized expert in horse-breeding and the tax consequences of related investments. Plummer encouraged investors to take advantage of a provision in the tax code which classified horse-breeding investments as farming expenses, entitling investors to a five-year net operating loss carryback period instead of the typical two years. See26 U.S.C. § 172(b)(1)(G).

An investor in the Program would lease a breeding mare from New Classic Breeders for a single season; the mare would be paired with a suitable stallion, and the investor could keep any resulting foals, which could then be either kept or sold. Investors could deduct the amount of their initial investment—which, unsurprisingly, tended to be based on the amount they wished to deduct for the previous five years—and also realize the gain from owning a valuable Thoroughbred foal. Investors were encouraged to hold their foals for at least two years before selling them, qualifying the sale for the much lower long-term capital gains tax rate. See26 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3)(A).

Between 2001 and 2005, the Mare Lease Program generated more than $600 million in revenue. The Program was aggressively marketed to wealthy individuals, who were assured that it was a reliable way to generate tax deductions and convert ordinary income into long-term capital gains. Accordingly, the economic success of the Program hinged on the investors' eligibility to receive the advertised tax benefits. To reassure investors that the Program's tax advantages were legitimate, they were given tax advice by two law firms hired by Defendants: Handler, Thayer, and Duggan, LLC, and Hanna Strader P.C. These firms and an accounting firm purported to have vetted the Mare Lease Program, and they opined that the investments would be fully tax deductible as promised.

B. The Scheme

GeoStar Corporation is a privately held company specializing in oil and gas exploration. By around 2000, GeoStar and its publicly traded affiliate, Gastar Exploration, Ltd., had acquired a number of undeveloped oil and gas properties, and they were looking for ways to raise capital to exploit these properties. GeoStar executives were introduced to David Plummer and the Mare Lease Program around that time, and in 2001, GeoStar acquired New Classic Breeders through a holding company it created named ClassicStar Farms, Inc., and it renamed the business ClassicStar, LLC (ClassicStar). David Plummer served as the president of ClassicStar Farms, Inc. until 2003, when he became GeoStar's director of marketing. After David Plummer moved to GeoStar, his son Spencer Plummer became president of ClassicStar Farms. Together with GeoStar executives, including Defendants, they operated the Mare Lease Program.

In an effort to finance its undeveloped oil and gas properties, GeoStar encouraged Mare Lease Program investors to exchange their interests in the Program for interests in coalbed methane wells owned by GeoStar subsidiaries, as well as Gastar stock. GeoStar and ClassicStar told investors that they could take advantage of the five-year operating loss carryback period associated with their horse-breeding investments, and then quickly convert those investments into oil and gas interests that, unlike the foals, would not need to be held for two years before being sold. Investors were told that these transfers would be tax-free because they could deduct any gain from the conversion as intangible drilling costs associated with the development of the wells. See26 U.S.C. § 263(c). In this way, GeoStar was able to channel investors' money through the Mare Lease Program into its oil and gas developments.

To further entice investors into the Mare Lease Program, ClassicStar arranged for a large part (usually half) of the initial investment to be financed through the National Equine Lending Company (“NELC”), which was represented to be “a national lender on approved credit.” (R. 1701, Ex. 9, at 7.) Investors would deduct the entirety of their investment, including the loan, from their taxable income from the past five years.1 Although it was consistently described as a third-party lender, NELC was in fact owned and operated by Gary Thomson, David Plummer's brother-in-law. Spencer Plummer told one of Plaintiffs' financial advisers that we can control him [Thomson] and what he does,” (R. 1701, Ex. 7, at 8,) but none of the investors was ever told that NELC had no funds of its own. ClassicStar provided all of NELC's funds and arranged sham three-way transactions in which funds were transferred from ClassicStar to NELC, loaned to an investor, and then paid back to ClassicStar as part of an investment in the Mare Lease Program. The purpose of these transactions was to make the Program attractive to investors by allowing them to drastically increase their investments and, by extension, their tax deductions.

GeoStar and ClassicStar's efforts in promoting the Mare Lease Program were successful, so successful in fact that investors purchased interests in many more mares than were actually owned by ClassicStar. Although investors were repeatedly told that they were leasing actual horses, ClassicStar never owned anywhere near the number of horses purportedly being leased. Between 2001 and 2004, ClassicStar owned between $10 million and $56 million worth of mares, but sold an average of $150 million worth of mare lease packages during each of those years. (R. 1701, Ex. 23.) By the end of 2004, the difference between the value of the mares owned by ClassicStar and the value of the mare leases sold to investors was approximately $270 million. (R. 1701, Ex. 5, at 195–97.) To disguise the shortfall, ClassicStar substituted less valuable quarter-horses for Thoroughbreds and, in many cases, simply did not identify the horses that investors believed they were leasing.

To conceal the shortfall of mares and funnel money into their oil and gas interests, GeoStar and ClassicStar encouraged investors to exchange their mare leases for interests in various oil and gas properties. However, by mid–2003, these interests were also oversold. The tax deductions for intangible drilling costs used to entice investors out of the Mare Lease Program, like the mare lease deductions themselves, were dubious because they were based on fictitious assets, work that was never performed, and costs that were never expended.

Faced with a severe shortfall of assets in both the Mare Lease Program and their oil and gas programs, and no longer wishing to offer investors Gastar stock in exchange for their (largely worthless) interests in these other programs, GeoStar and ClassicStar created First Equine Energy Partners, LLC (“FEEP”). FEEP purported to offer investors a vehicle to combine equine interests—those contributed to the program by the investors themselves—with oil and gas interests to be contributed by GeoStar and its subsidiaries. (R. 1701, Ex. 68.) However, FEEP was never properly funded by GeoStar, and it owned either few assets or none at all. As one of Plaintiffs' experts testified, “FEEP as realized by ClassicStar was merely another means to perpetuate the ruse that began with the Mare Lease Program in which ClassicStar failed to deliver mares to participants.” (R. 1701, Ex. 9, at 65.)

As a result of the dramatic overselling of the Mare Lease Program, resulting in “investments” in horses that largely did not exist, coupled with the sham loans from NELC designed to artificially...

5 cases
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit – 2013
Jackson v. Sedgwick Claims Mgmt. Servs., Inc.
"... ... , Seikaly & Stewart, P.C., Farmington Hills, Michigan, for Appellants. Kathleen H. Klaus, ... 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007)); In re ClassicStar Mare Lease Litig., 727 F.3d 473, 483–84, 2013 ... "
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit – 2014
Cna Ins. Co. v. Hyundai Merch. Marine Co.
"... ... 3d 339 CNA INSURANCE COMPANY, a/s/o Corning, Inc., Plaintiff–Appellee/Cross–Appellant, v ... in its favor.” In re M/V Rickmers Genoa Litig., 622 F.Supp.2d 56, 72 (S.D.N.Y.2009) (citing ... the court's attention to In re ClassicStar Mare Lease Litigation, 727 F.3d 473, 494–97 ... "
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit – 2019
Llacua v. W. Range Ass'n
"... ... Ken-Mac Metals, Inc. , 458 F.3d 1073, 1082 (10th Cir. 2006). The ... Brokerage Antitrust Litig. , 618 F.3d 300, 326 (3d Cir. 2010) (explaining ... 1993) ; see also W. Hills Farms, LLC v. ClassicStar Farms, Inc. (In re sicStar Mare Lease Litig.) , 727 F.3d 473, 490 (6th Cir ... "
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit – 2017
Harkness v. Sec'y of the Navy
"... ... Grendel's Den, Inc. , 459 U.S. 116, 103 S.Ct. 505, 74 L.Ed.2d 297 ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota – 2019
Iota Phi Lambda Sorority, Inc. v. Contenta Glob. Capital Grp., LLC
"... ... Securities Litig ., No. 94-179, 1996 WL 411654, at *4 (E.D. Penn ... rate shall apply."); see also In re ClassicStar Mare Lease Litig ., 727 F.3d 473, 497 (6th Cir ... Supp. 2d 975, 978 (D. Minn. 2012); Flint Hills Res ... LP v ... Lovegreen Turbine Servs ., Inc ., ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial
2 books and journal articles
Document | Proof of Conspiracy Under Federal Antitrust Laws. Second Edition – 2018
Table of Cases
"..., 151 In re ClassicStar Mare Lease Litig., 823 F. Supp. 2d 599 (E.D. Ky. 2011), amended in part , 2012 WL 1080569 (E.D. Ky. 2012), aff’d , 727 F.3d 473 (6th Cir. 2013), aff’d , 727 F.3d 473 (6th Cir. 2013), 53 Cliff Food Stores v. Kroger, Inc., 417 F.2d 203 (5th Cir. 1969), 134 Clorox Co. v..."
Document | Proof of Conspiracy Under Federal Antitrust Laws. Second Edition – 2018
What Constitutes a Conspiracy?
"...ClassicStar Mare Lease Litig., 823 F. Supp. 2d 599, 638 (E.D. Ky. 2011) (RICO), amended in part , 2012 WL 1080569 (E.D. Ky. 2012), aff’d , 727 F.3d 473 (6th Cir. 2013), aff’d , 727 F.3d 473 (6th Cir. 2013); In re Managed Care Litig., 430 F. Supp. 2d 1336, 1347 (S.D.Fla. 2006) (RICO), aff’d ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 books and journal articles
Document | Proof of Conspiracy Under Federal Antitrust Laws. Second Edition – 2018
Table of Cases
"..., 151 In re ClassicStar Mare Lease Litig., 823 F. Supp. 2d 599 (E.D. Ky. 2011), amended in part , 2012 WL 1080569 (E.D. Ky. 2012), aff’d , 727 F.3d 473 (6th Cir. 2013), aff’d , 727 F.3d 473 (6th Cir. 2013), 53 Cliff Food Stores v. Kroger, Inc., 417 F.2d 203 (5th Cir. 1969), 134 Clorox Co. v..."
Document | Proof of Conspiracy Under Federal Antitrust Laws. Second Edition – 2018
What Constitutes a Conspiracy?
"...ClassicStar Mare Lease Litig., 823 F. Supp. 2d 599, 638 (E.D. Ky. 2011) (RICO), amended in part , 2012 WL 1080569 (E.D. Ky. 2012), aff’d , 727 F.3d 473 (6th Cir. 2013), aff’d , 727 F.3d 473 (6th Cir. 2013); In re Managed Care Litig., 430 F. Supp. 2d 1336, 1347 (S.D.Fla. 2006) (RICO), aff’d ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit – 2013
Jackson v. Sedgwick Claims Mgmt. Servs., Inc.
"... ... , Seikaly & Stewart, P.C., Farmington Hills, Michigan, for Appellants. Kathleen H. Klaus, ... 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007)); In re ClassicStar Mare Lease Litig., 727 F.3d 473, 483–84, 2013 ... "
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit – 2014
Cna Ins. Co. v. Hyundai Merch. Marine Co.
"... ... 3d 339 CNA INSURANCE COMPANY, a/s/o Corning, Inc., Plaintiff–Appellee/Cross–Appellant, v ... in its favor.” In re M/V Rickmers Genoa Litig., 622 F.Supp.2d 56, 72 (S.D.N.Y.2009) (citing ... the court's attention to In re ClassicStar Mare Lease Litigation, 727 F.3d 473, 494–97 ... "
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit – 2019
Llacua v. W. Range Ass'n
"... ... Ken-Mac Metals, Inc. , 458 F.3d 1073, 1082 (10th Cir. 2006). The ... Brokerage Antitrust Litig. , 618 F.3d 300, 326 (3d Cir. 2010) (explaining ... 1993) ; see also W. Hills Farms, LLC v. ClassicStar Farms, Inc. (In re sicStar Mare Lease Litig.) , 727 F.3d 473, 490 (6th Cir ... "
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit – 2017
Harkness v. Sec'y of the Navy
"... ... Grendel's Den, Inc. , 459 U.S. 116, 103 S.Ct. 505, 74 L.Ed.2d 297 ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota – 2019
Iota Phi Lambda Sorority, Inc. v. Contenta Glob. Capital Grp., LLC
"... ... Securities Litig ., No. 94-179, 1996 WL 411654, at *4 (E.D. Penn ... rate shall apply."); see also In re ClassicStar Mare Lease Litig ., 727 F.3d 473, 497 (6th Cir ... Supp. 2d 975, 978 (D. Minn. 2012); Flint Hills Res ... LP v ... Lovegreen Turbine Servs ., Inc ., ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex