Sign Up for Vincent AI
Walker v. State
Earnest Lee Walker, appellant, pro se.
Steve Marshall, atty. gen., and John J. Davis, asst. atty. gen., for appellee.
Earnest Lee Walker appeals the Mobile Circuit Court's summary dismissal of his Rule 32, Ala. R. Crim. P., petition for postconviction relief. Walker's appeal presents these issues: (1) whether Walker was constructively denied the assistance of counsel; (2) whether Walker's trial counsel was ineffective for allegedly failing to properly investigate his case and prepare for trial; (3) whether Walker's trial counsel was ineffective for allegedly providing Walker erroneous advice about sentencing and Walker's eligibility for parole; (4) whether Walker's sentences are illegal because they were enhanced by allegedly invalid convictions; (5) whether Walker's appellate counsel was ineffective for allegedly failing to ensure that the record in his direct appeal was complete; (6) whether Walker's trial counsel was ineffective for allegedly preventing Walker from testifying in his own defense at trial; (7) whether Walker's right to the counsel of his choice was violated; (8) whether the circuit court erred in not addressing pro se issues that Walker allegedly raised in the first three Rule 32 petitions but that his counsel did not raise in Walker's fourth amended petition; and (9) whether the circuit court erred in adopting the proposed order the State submitted. For the reasons discussed below, we hold that the summary dismissal of Walker's petition was appropriate.
Walker was convicted, following a jury trial, on March 4, 2009, of first-degree burglary, see § 13A-7-5(a)(2), Ala. Code 1975; first-degree sexual abuse, see § 13A-6-66(a)(1), Ala. Code 1975; attempted first-degree sodomy, see § 13A-4-2 and § 13A-6-63, Ala. Code 1975; and obstructing justice, see § 13A-8-194, Ala. Code 1975. The circuit court applied the Habitual Felony Offender Act ("the HFOA"), see § 13A-5-9, Ala. Code 1975, in sentencing Walker, who had at least five prior felony convictions. The circuit court sentenced Walker to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole on the first-degree burglary conviction and to life imprisonment on each of the remaining convictions. The circuit court ordered that the sentences were to run consecutively.
This Court affirmed Walker's convictions and sentences by an unpublished memorandum. See Walker v. State (No. CR-08-1521), 75 So. 3d 1228 (Ala. Crim. App. 2010) (table).1 The Alabama Supreme Court denied Walker's petition for a writ of certiorari. Ex parte Walker, 83 So. 3d 593 (Ala. 2010). This Court issued the certificate of judgment, making Walker's judgments of conviction final, on May 7, 2010.
This Court's memorandum affirming Walker's convictions and sentences stated:
Walker timely filed the instant petition on February 7, 2011.2 (C. 26-147.) Walker amended his petition four times, and the State filed an answer and a motion to dismiss each petition. (C. 736, 794, 1201, 1214, 1224, 1228, 1270.) In his fourth amended petition, Walker alleged: (1) that he was constructively denied counsel between the time of his preliminary hearing and his arraignment 11 months later (C. 1228); (2) that his trial counsel "failed to properly advise [Walker] about sentencing and the trial court gave [Walker] incorrect advice on time to be served on a 25-year sentence" (C. 1232); (3) that his sentences are ...
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting