Case Law Ward v. Corning Painted Post Area Sch. Dist.

Ward v. Corning Painted Post Area Sch. Dist.

Document Cited Authorities (10) Cited in (2) Related

WELCH, DONLON & CZARPLES, PLLC, CORNING (MICHAEL A. DONLON OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

GOLDBERG SEGALLA LLP, BUFFALO (RAUL E. MARTINEZ OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

KENNEY SHELTON LIPTAK NOWAK LLP, BUFFALO (AARON M. ADOFF OF COUNSEL), FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, TROUTMAN, BANNISTER, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this Labor Law §§ 200, 240 (1), 241 (6), and common-law negligence action to recover damages for injuries he sustained when he fell from an extension ladder while carrying a 10-foot metal "pour stop" to the second floor of a building at a construction site. Plaintiff appeals from an order that, inter alia, denied that part of his motion seeking partial summary judgment on the issue of liability with respect to his section 240 (1) claim and granted those parts of the cross motions of Corning Painted Post Area School District, Ormsby Iron, LLC, and Streeter Associates, Inc. (collectively, defendants) seeking summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's section 241 (6) claim. We affirm.

We reject plaintiff's contention that Supreme Court erred in denying that part of his motion with respect to the Labor Law § 240 (1) claim. Plaintiff failed to meet his initial burden on the motion inasmuch as his own submissions in support of the motion raised an issue of fact whether his conduct in "refusing to use available, safe and appropriate equipment" was the sole proximate cause of the accident ( Fazekas v. Time Warner Cable, Inc. , 132 A.D.3d 1401, 1403, 18 N.Y.S.3d 251 [4th Dept. 2015] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see generally Zuckerman v. City of New York , 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562, 427 N.Y.S.2d 595, 404 N.E.2d 718 [1980] ). Specifically, plaintiff submitted deposition testimony establishing the availability at the site of safer means for moving the pour stop, including a forklift and ropes that could have been used to lift or hoist the pour stop to the second floor. Deposition testimony also established that plaintiff could have handed the pour stop to a coworker on the second level. The foreman testified that he told plaintiff not to transport materials to the second floor by carrying items up the ladder. Plaintiff testified that he knew he should climb a ladder only when he was able to maintain three points of contact with the ladder and admitted that he was not able to do so while carrying the pour stop. Thus, we conclude that there is a triable issue of fact "whether plaintiff, based on his training, prior practice, and common sense, knew or should have known" not to carry the pour stop by hand up the ladder and to use other means available to him ( Mulcaire v. Buffalo Structural Steel Constr. Corp. , 45 A.D.3d 1426, 1427, 846 N.Y.S.2d 838 [4th Dept. 2007] ; cf. Smith v. Picone Constr. Corp. , 63 A.D.3d 1716, 1716-1717, 881 N.Y.S.2d 579 [4th Dept. 2009] ).

We reject plaintiff's contention that the court erred in granting those parts of defendantscross motions with respect to the Labor Law § 241 (6) claim, which is premised on alleged violations of 12 NYCRR 23-1.7 (f) and 12 NYCRR 23-6.2.

12 NYCRR 23-1.7 (f) provides that "[s]tairways, ramps or runways shall be provided as the means of access to working levels above or below ground except where the nature or the progress of the work prevents their installation in which case ladders or other safe means of access shall be provided." Defendants submitted evidence establishing that, at the time of the incident, the work had not yet progressed to the point that it was...

5 cases
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2022
Thomas v. N. Country Family Health Ctr., Inc.
"...means of lifting the sheetrock and that using a ladder to perform that task was unsafe (see Ward v. Corning Painted Post Area Sch. Dist. , 192 A.D.3d 1563, 1564, 145 N.Y.S.3d 700 [4th Dept. 2021] ; Banks v. LPCiminelli, Inc. , 125 A.D.3d 1334, 1334-1335, 4 N.Y.S.3d 416 [4th Dept. 2015] ). A..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2022
Thomas v. N. Country Family Health Ctr.
"... ... task was unsafe (see Ward v Corning Painted Post Area ... Sch. Dist., 192 ... "
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2021
Rider v. Rainbow Mobile Home Park, LLP
"... ... Corp. v. New York City Sch. Constr. Auth. , 186 A.D.3d 543, 543-544, 129 ... "
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2022
Davis v. Evangelical Lutheran Church in Am.
"..."
Document | New York Supreme Court – 2022
Davis v. Evangelical Lutheran Church in Am.
"..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2022
Thomas v. N. Country Family Health Ctr., Inc.
"...means of lifting the sheetrock and that using a ladder to perform that task was unsafe (see Ward v. Corning Painted Post Area Sch. Dist. , 192 A.D.3d 1563, 1564, 145 N.Y.S.3d 700 [4th Dept. 2021] ; Banks v. LPCiminelli, Inc. , 125 A.D.3d 1334, 1334-1335, 4 N.Y.S.3d 416 [4th Dept. 2015] ). A..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2022
Thomas v. N. Country Family Health Ctr.
"... ... task was unsafe (see Ward v Corning Painted Post Area ... Sch. Dist., 192 ... "
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2021
Rider v. Rainbow Mobile Home Park, LLP
"... ... Corp. v. New York City Sch. Constr. Auth. , 186 A.D.3d 543, 543-544, 129 ... "
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2022
Davis v. Evangelical Lutheran Church in Am.
"..."
Document | New York Supreme Court – 2022
Davis v. Evangelical Lutheran Church in Am.
"..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex