Sign Up for Vincent AI
Wilkins v. McCallan (In re McCallan)
Steve Olen, Cunningham Bounds, LLC, Mobile, AL, for Plaintiff.
Carly B. Wilkins, Carly B. Wilkins, P.C., Montgomery, AL, Plaintiff, Pro Se.
Michael A. Fritz, Sr., Orin Clayton Odom, III, Scott D. Widerman, Widerman Malek, PL, Montgomery, AL, for Defendant.
This Adversary Proceeding was tried by the undersigned, without a jury, on October 4-7, 2021. Plaintiff Carly B. Wilkins, the Chapter 7 Trustee in the underlying case of Timothy McCallan, was represented by counsel Steve Olen and Defendant Jeanne McCallan was represented by counsel Orin Clayton Odom, III, and Scott D. Widerman. After the close of evidence, the Court requested that the parties file Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, which both parties have done. (Docs. 195-96).1 For the reasons set out below, the Court enters judgment in favor of Plaintiff Carly B. Wilkins, the Chapter 7 Trustee, and against Defendant Jeanne McCallan, in the amount of $5,607,679.06.
This all began, from this Court's point of view, on February 22, 2010, when Keith Nelms, a lawyer in a solo practice with an office on Cobbs Ford Road in Prattville, Alabama, filed a petition in bankruptcy pursuant to Chapter 7.2 Case No. 10-30430. Nelms had been in the debt management and debt settlement business only since 2008. Nelms did not start this business from scratch, rather he took over the business of Hess-Kennedy, a Florida concern which had been put out of business by the State of Florida in 2008. Office of the Attorney General v. Laura Hess, Esq. , No. 08-7686 (Cir. Ct. Broward County, Fla. July 17, 2008). Nelms began operating in Alabama under the name Allegro Law. Hess-Kennedy had been defrauding customers for years, and the State of Florida put a stop to it. As a result, McCallan moved his fraudulent debt settlement and debt management operations to Alabama, using Nelms, rather than Laura Hess as a front. The State of Alabama was put wise to this fraudulent business by Florida officials and as a result, proceedings were filed in the Circuit Court of Autauga County against the Allegro entities and Nelms himself.3
Nelms filed his Chapter 7 petition in an effort to stave off efforts by the State of Alabama to shut him down, as well as to stay other litigation. After Nelms filed his Chapter 7 petition, Wilkins discovered that he owned both Allegro Law and Allegro Financial Services.4 Wilkins promptly put both entities in bankruptcy on March 12, 2010. (In re Allegro financial Services, LLC , Case No. 10-30630) (In re Allegro Law, LLC , Case No. 10-30631). When Wilkins took control over more than $16 million in cash, it soon became apparent that this was not a run of the mill small business bankruptcy. (10-30631, Doc. 55). Wilkins began a lengthy and tortuous effort to learn about the business affairs of Nelms and the Allegro entities. It was soon learned that there were tens of thousands of customers and more than $100,000,000 which had traveled through the bank accounts of the Allegro entities and their affiliates and confederates during the time that Nelms operated the Allegro entities. Over the next several years, the Court heard considerable testimony from Nelms and it was soon apparent that he had no more than a rudimentary understanding of the business of the Allegro entities and very little knowledge of their financial affairs.
Shortly after Nelms filed his Chapter 7 petition, Chase Bank brought suit against him alleging fraud. Adv. Pro. 10-3042. On July 24, 2014, this Court entered a judgment of nondischargeability in favor of Chase Bank, and against Nelms, in the amount of $10,000,000. (Adv. Pro. 10-3042, Docs. 138, 140, 142); Chase Bank USA, NA v. Nelms (In re Nelms) , Adv. Pro. No. 10-3042, 2014 WL 3700511 (Bankr. M.D. Ala. July 24, 2014) ; aff'd No. 14-CV-927 (M.D. Ala., Oct. 23, 2018) ; appeal to 11th Cir. dismissed as untimely on December 20, 2018. (No. 18-14130). The Supreme Court of Alabama suspended Nelms’ law license for a period of 3 years in an order dated July 9, 2009. The suspension was directly related to his activities connected to the Allegro entities. While Nelms’ bankruptcy case was pending, he telephoned a threat to the office of the undersigned. Nelms’ license suspension was extended by the State Bar for 90 days as a result. As of the date of this Memorandum, Nelms’ Alabama law license has not been reinstated.5
As it had become apparent that Nelms was merely acting as a front for the illegal activities engaged in by the Allegro entities and before that the Hess-Kennedy organization in Florida, Wilkins expanded her investigation. Nelms was nominally running an organization serving 10's of thousands of debt management and debt settlement customers and taking in more than $100,000,000 in cash from those customers, yet he didn't seem to know what he was doing and, more importantly, a solo practitioner on Cobbs Ford Road in Prattville, Alabama did not have the infrastructure necessary to support such an organization. Large payments had been made by Allegro to an entity called AmeriCorp. It was later revealed that AmeriCorp kept all the records and controlled all of the money. Nelms was fronting the organization, using his law license to represent his clients, or customers, and shielding those behind him from scrutiny.
In an effort to look behind Nelms, Wilkins brought suit against AmeriCorp, Inc., Seton, Inc., and Timothy McCallan. Adv. Pro. 11-3007. After lengthy and pretrial proceedings, and scheduling a trial, for which McCallan, the other defendants and their lawyer did not show, this Court entered judgment in the amount of $102,000,000 in favor of Wilkins against McCallan, Seton and AmeriCorp. (11-3007, Docs. 361-62); Wilkins v. AmeriCorp, Inc., (In re Allegro Law, LLC) , 545 B.R. 675 (Bankr. M.D. Ala. 2016). In that Memorandum Decision, this Court described McCallan's business as follows:
There are three takeaways from AP 11-3007 that are relevant to this Adversary Proceeding. First, McCallan's underlying debt settlement business was a massive fraud, designed to separate a large number of dollars from tens of thousands of people. Second, during the course of litigating AP 11-3007, McCallan and his confederates went to considerable effort to hide the true nature of his business, forcing the Trustee to do a tremendous amount of work. See 545 B.R. 675, 684-695 (). Third, once judgment was entered, McCallan was held in contempt of court and incarcerated for more than two years for secreting more than $20 million. Wilkins v. AmeriCorp, Inc., (In re Allegro Law, LLC) , AP 11-3007, 2018 WL 2373639 ();6 Wilkins v. AmeriCorp, Inc. (In re Allegro Law, LLC) , No. 11-3007, 2019 WL 4411822 (Bankr. M.D. Ala. Sept. 17, 2019) (...
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting