Sign Up for Vincent AI
Williams v. New York City Transit Authority
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
In support of their motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, the plaintiffs established that a motor vehicle operated by the plaintiff Rosalyn Williams in the rightmost lane of the Gowanus Expressway, in Brooklyn, was struck by a bus owned by the defendant New York City Transit Authority and operated by the defendant William Meier when the bus moved to the right, in violation of ...
5 cases
Gordon v. Calderon
"... ... Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Center, 64 N.Y.2d ... 851, 508 N.Y.S.2d ... 793 (1988); Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d ... 557, 427 N.Y.S.2d 595 ... causing the collision); Williams v. New York City Transit ... Authority, 37 A.D.3d ... "
Gabriel v. Great Lakes Concrete Prods. LLC
"...thus establishing that Bonnett's negligence was a proximate cause of the accident (see Williams v. New York City Tr. Auth., 37 A.D.3d 827, 827–828, 832 N.Y.S.2d 54 ; see also Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1128[a] ; see generally Russo v. Pearson, 148 A.D.3d 1762, 1763, 50 N.Y.S.3d 757 ). Defend..."
Briggs v. Rockall Contrsuction Inc.
"...for the accident. Flores v. City of New York, 66. A.D.3d 599, 888 N.Y.S.2d 27 (1st Dept. 2009); Williams v. New York City Transit Auth., 37 A.D.3d 827, 828, 832 N.Y.S.2d 54, 55 (2d Dept. 2007). Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1162 further provides that "[n]o person shall move a vehicle which is s..."
Daddi v. Valencia
"...1128(a). This evidence established the plaintiff's prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Williams v. New York City Tr. Auth., 37 A.D.3d 827, 832 N.Y.S.2d 54 ). In opposition to the motion, the defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Summers v. Teddy Cab ..."
Vidor v. Davila
"... ... Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York", Second Department ... Decided February 27, 2007 ... \xC2" ... v Thibiu, 29 AD3d 507, 508 [2006]; Kearse v New York City Tr. Auth., 16 AD3d 45, 49 [2005]). The mere existence of a ... "
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
5 cases
Gordon v. Calderon
"... ... Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Center, 64 N.Y.2d ... 851, 508 N.Y.S.2d ... 793 (1988); Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d ... 557, 427 N.Y.S.2d 595 ... causing the collision); Williams v. New York City Transit ... Authority, 37 A.D.3d ... "
Gabriel v. Great Lakes Concrete Prods. LLC
"...thus establishing that Bonnett's negligence was a proximate cause of the accident (see Williams v. New York City Tr. Auth., 37 A.D.3d 827, 827–828, 832 N.Y.S.2d 54 ; see also Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1128[a] ; see generally Russo v. Pearson, 148 A.D.3d 1762, 1763, 50 N.Y.S.3d 757 ). Defend..."
Briggs v. Rockall Contrsuction Inc.
"...for the accident. Flores v. City of New York, 66. A.D.3d 599, 888 N.Y.S.2d 27 (1st Dept. 2009); Williams v. New York City Transit Auth., 37 A.D.3d 827, 828, 832 N.Y.S.2d 54, 55 (2d Dept. 2007). Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1162 further provides that "[n]o person shall move a vehicle which is s..."
Daddi v. Valencia
"...1128(a). This evidence established the plaintiff's prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Williams v. New York City Tr. Auth., 37 A.D.3d 827, 832 N.Y.S.2d 54 ). In opposition to the motion, the defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Summers v. Teddy Cab ..."
Vidor v. Davila
"... ... Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York", Second Department ... Decided February 27, 2007 ... \xC2" ... v Thibiu, 29 AD3d 507, 508 [2006]; Kearse v New York City Tr. Auth., 16 AD3d 45, 49 [2005]). The mere existence of a ... "
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting