Case Law Wilson v. USI Ins. Serv. LLC

Wilson v. USI Ins. Serv. LLC

Document Cited Authorities (43) Cited in (123) Related

Rhonda H. Wilson, 8 Penn Center, 1628 John F. Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 400, Philadelphia, PA 19103, Counsel for Appellants in No. 20-3124

Daniel J. Dugan [ARGUED], Neal R. Troum, Spector Gadon Rosen & Vinci, 1635 Market Street, 7th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19103, Counsel for Appellant in No. 20-3501

Robert A. Freedberg, Christian M. Perrucci [ARGUED], Florio Perrucci Steinhardt Cappelli Tipton & Taylor, 91 Larry Holmes Drive, Suite 200, Easton, PA 18042, Counsel for Appellant in No. 20-3594

Walter J. Andrews [ARGUED], Hunton Andrews Kurth, 333 Southeast 2 Avenue, Suite 2400, Miami, FL 33131, Scott P. DeVries, Hunton Andrews Kurth, 50 California Street, Suite 1700, San Francisco, CA 94111, Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth, 2200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20037, Elbert Lin, Hunton Andrews Kurth, 951 East Byrd Street, Riverfront Plaza, East Tower, Richmond, VA 23219, John R. Sawyer, Stark & Stark, 993 Lenox Drive, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648, Kevin V. Small, Hunton Andrews Kurth, 200 Park Avenue, 52nd Floor, New York, NY 10166, Counsel for Appellant in No. 21-1061

Laurence S. Berman, Arnold Levin, Daniel C. Levin, Frederick S. Longer, Levin Sedran & Berman, 510 Walnut Street, Suite 500, Philadelphia, PA 19106, Counsel for Appellants in Nos. 21-1106, 21-1107, 21-1038, 21-1039 & 21-1294

Kenneth J. Grunfeld, Golomb Spirt Grunfeld, 1835 Market Street, Suite 2900, Philadelphia, PA 19103, Counsel for Appellants in Nos. 21-1106, 21-1107, 21-1294, 21-1038 & 21-1039

Richard M. Golomb, Golomb Spirt Grunfeld, 1835 Market Street, Suite 2900, Philadelphia, PA 19103, Counsel for Appellants in Nos. 21-1038, 21-1039 & 21-1294

Wilson D. Miles, III, Rachel N. Minder, Beasley Allen Crow Methvin Portis & Miles, 218 Commerce Street, Montgomery, AL 36104, Counsel for Appellant in 21-1294, 21-1106 & 21-1107

Paul W. Evans, Beasley Allen Crow Methvin Portis & Miles, 218 Commerce Street, Montgomery, AL 36104, Counsel for Appellant in 21-1294

R. Bruce Carlson, Carlson Brown, 222 Broad Street, P.O. Box 242, Sewickley, PA 15143, Ted A. Hages, Matthew Louik, James C. Martin [ARGUED], Devin M. Misour, George L. Stewart, II, Colin E. Wrabley Reed Smith, 225 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1200, Pittsburgh, PA 15222, Kelly K. Iverson, Gary F. Lynch, Lynch Carpenter, 1133 Penn Avenue, 5th Floor, Pittsburgh, PA 15222, Counsel for Appellant in No. 21-1109

Alan M. Feldman, Edward S. Goldis, Daniel J. Mann, Andrew K. Mitnick, Bethany R. Nikitenko, Feldman Shepherd Wohlgelernter Tanner Weinstock & Dodig, 1845 Walnut Street, 21st Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19103, James A. Francis, David A. Searles, John Soumilas, Francis Mailman Soumilas, 1600 Market Street, Suite 2510, Philadelphia, PA 19103, Counsel for Appellant in No. 21-1175

Alan C. Milstein, Sherman Silverstein Kohl Rose & Podolsky, 308 Harper Drive, Suite 200, Eastgate Corporate Center, Moorestown, NJ 08057, Counsel for Appellants in No. 21-1240

James E. Cecchi, Brian F. O'Toole [ARGUED], Lindsey H. Taylor, Carella Byrne Cecchi Olstein Brody & Agnello, 5 Becker Farm Road, Roseland, NJ 07068, Christopher A. Seeger, Seeger Weiss, 55 Challenger Road, 6th Floor, Ridgefield Park, NJ 07660, Counsel for Appellants in Nos. 21-1414 & 21-1315

Paul J. Geller, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, 120 East Palmetto Park Road, Suite 500, Boca Raton, FL 33432, Samuel H. Rudman, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, 58 South Service Road, Suite 200, Melville, NY 11747, Counsel for Appellant in No. 21-1315

Bethany Barrese, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, 233 Mount Airy Road, Basking Ridge, NJ 07920, Brian J. Clifford, Janie A. Eddy, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, 35 Nutmeg Drive, Suite 140, Trumbull, CT 06611, Gregory D. Podolak, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, 999 Vanderbilt Beach Road, Suite 603, Naples, FL 34108, Counsel for Amicus Appellant Saxe Doernberger & Vita PC

Gabriel K. Gillett, Jenner & Block, 353 North Clark Street, Suite 4500, Chicago, IL 60654, Counsel for Amici Appellants Pennsylvania Restaurant & Lodging Association and Restaurant Law Center in Nos. 20-3124, 21-1038, 21-1039, 21-1106, 21-1107, 21-1109, 21-1175, 21-1240 & 21-1294

Lisa M. Campisi, Blank Rome, 1271 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020, Charles A. Fitzpatrick, IV, Blank Rome, 130 North 18th Street, One Logan Square, Philadelphia, PA, 19103, Counsel for Amicus Appellant United Policyholders Nos. 21-1038, 21-1039, 21-1106, 21-1107, 21-1109 & 21-1294

Nicholas M. Insua, Reed Smith, 599 Lexington Avenue, 22nd Floor, New York, NY 10022, Counsel for Amicus Appellant United Policyholders in No. 21-1061

Christopher P. Leise, White & Williams, 457 Haddonfield Road, Liberty View, Suite 400, Cherry Hill, NJ 08002, Marc L. Penchansky, White & Williams, 1650 Market Street, One Liberty Place, Suite 1800, Philadelphia, PA 19103, Counsel for Appellee USI Insurance Services LLC in No. 20-3124

Wystan M. Ackerman, J. Tyler Butts, Gregory P. Varga, Robinson & Cole, 280 Trumbull Street, One Commercial Plaza, Hartford, CT 06103, Counsel for Appellee in No. 20-3501

Richard D. Gable, Jr., Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig, 1818 Market Street, Suite 2740, Philadelphia, PA 19103, Counsel for Appellee in Nos. 20-3501, 21-1106, 21-1107 & Appellee Hartford Casualty Insurance Company in No. 20-3124

Jonathan M. Freiman, David R. Roth [ARGUED], Wiggin & Dana, One Century Tower, 265 Church Street, New Haven, CT 06510, Counsel for Appellee in Nos. 21-1240, 21-1106, 21-1107, 21-1315 & Appellee Hartford Casualty Insurance Company in No. 20-3124

Sarah D. Gordon, Steptoe & Johnson, 1330 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20036, Counsel for Appellee in Nos. 21-1315, No. 21-1240, 21-1106, 21-1107 & Appellee Hartford Casualty Insurance Company in No. 20-3124

James L. Brochin, Steptoe & Johnson, 1114 Avenue of the Americas, 35th Floor, New York, NY 10036, Ryan M. Chabot, Alan E. Schoenfeld, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr, 7 World Trade Center, 250 Greenwich Street, New York, NY 10007, Counsel for Appellee in No. 21-1315

John J. Kavanagh, Steptoe & Johnson, 1330 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20036, Counsel for Appellee in Nos. 21-1106, 21-1107, 21-1240 & Appellee Hartford Casualty Insurance Company in No. 20-3124

Caitlin R. Tharp, Steptoe & Johnson, 1330 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20036, Counsel for Appellee in No. 21-1240

Alan I. Becker, Daniel G. Litchfield, Laurence J. W. Tooth, Litchfield Cavo, 303 West Madison Street, Suite 303, Chicago, IL 60606, Counsel for Appellees in No. 20-3594

Eric A. Fitzgerald, Hillary Ladov, McAngus Goudelock & Courie, P.O. Box 12519, Columbia, SC 29211, Antonia B. Ianniello, John F. O'Connor, Jr., Steptoe & Johnson, 1330 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20036, Counsel for Appellees in Nos. 21-1038 & 21-1039

Michael D. Hynes, DLA Piper, 1251 Avenue of the Americas, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10020, Brett D. Solberg, DLA Piper, 845 Texas Avenue, Suite 3800, Houston, TX 77002, Counsel for Appellee in No. 21-1061

Robert L. Byer, Julie S. Greenberg, Duane Morris, 625 Liberty Avenue, Suite 1000, Pittsburgh, PA 15222, Damon Vocke, Duane Morris, 1540 Broadway, New York, NY 10036, Counsel for Appellee in No. 21-1109

Fred L. Alvarez, David E. Walker, Walker Wilcox Matousek, One North Franklin Street, Suite 3200, Chicago, IL 60606, Paul L. Fields, Jr., Fields Howell, 665 8th Street, N.W., Atlanta, GA 30318, Marc R. Kamin, Michael J. Smith, Stewart Smith, 300 Conshohocken State Road, 300 Four Falls Corporate Center, Suite 670, West Conshohocken, PA 19428, Gregory L. Mast, Fields Howell, 665 8th Street, N.W., Atlanta, GA 30318, Counsel for Appellee in No. 21-1175

Michael E. DiFebbo, Jr., Elizabeth A. Sutton, Kennedys CMK, 1600 Market Street,...

5 cases
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit – 2023
United States v. Gallman
"..."
Document | New Jersey Supreme Court – 2024
AC Ocean Walk v. Am. Guarantee & Liab. Ins. Co.
"...denotes the destruction of the property or a physical change to the property that renders it unusable or uninhabitable. In Wilson v. USI Insurance Service LLC, the Third Circuit defined the policy language "direct physical loss … of property" to mean "a failure to maintain tangible possessi..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey – 2023
Gosden v. ErazorBits, Inc.
"...legal conclusions and recitals of the elements of a cause of action that are supported only by mere conclusory statements.” Wilson, 57 F.4th at 140 (citing Oakwood 'ys LLC v. Thanoo, 999 F.3d 892, 903 (3d Cir. 2021)). The defendant bringing a Rule 12(b)(6) motion bears the burden of “showin..."
Document | Connecticut Court of Appeals – 2024
Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation v. Factory Mut. Ins. Co.
"...23 (1st Cir. 2022); Verveme Corp v. Strathmore Ins. Co., 489 Mass. 534, 184 N.E.3d 1266 (2022).33See also Wilson v. USI Ins. Service, LLC, 57 F.4th 131, 141-44 (3rd Cir. 2023) (under Pennsylvania and New Jersey law, loss of use of property due to COVID-19 did not constitute direct physical ..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey – 2023
Rizas v. Dejoy
"...legal conclusions and recitals of the elements of a cause of action that are supported only by mere conclusory statements." Wilson, 57 F.4th at 140 (citing Oakwood Lab'ys LLC v. Thanoo, 999 892, 903 (3d Cir. 2021)). The defendant bringing a Rule 12(b)(6) motion bears the burden of "showing ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit – 2023
United States v. Gallman
"..."
Document | New Jersey Supreme Court – 2024
AC Ocean Walk v. Am. Guarantee & Liab. Ins. Co.
"...denotes the destruction of the property or a physical change to the property that renders it unusable or uninhabitable. In Wilson v. USI Insurance Service LLC, the Third Circuit defined the policy language "direct physical loss … of property" to mean "a failure to maintain tangible possessi..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey – 2023
Gosden v. ErazorBits, Inc.
"...legal conclusions and recitals of the elements of a cause of action that are supported only by mere conclusory statements.” Wilson, 57 F.4th at 140 (citing Oakwood 'ys LLC v. Thanoo, 999 F.3d 892, 903 (3d Cir. 2021)). The defendant bringing a Rule 12(b)(6) motion bears the burden of “showin..."
Document | Connecticut Court of Appeals – 2024
Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation v. Factory Mut. Ins. Co.
"...23 (1st Cir. 2022); Verveme Corp v. Strathmore Ins. Co., 489 Mass. 534, 184 N.E.3d 1266 (2022).33See also Wilson v. USI Ins. Service, LLC, 57 F.4th 131, 141-44 (3rd Cir. 2023) (under Pennsylvania and New Jersey law, loss of use of property due to COVID-19 did not constitute direct physical ..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey – 2023
Rizas v. Dejoy
"...legal conclusions and recitals of the elements of a cause of action that are supported only by mere conclusory statements." Wilson, 57 F.4th at 140 (citing Oakwood Lab'ys LLC v. Thanoo, 999 892, 903 (3d Cir. 2021)). The defendant bringing a Rule 12(b)(6) motion bears the burden of "showing ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex