Sign Up for Vincent AI
Wimbley v. State
Appeal from Washington Circuit Court (CC-09-170.60)
Corey Allen Wimbley, an inmate on Alabama's death row, appeals the circuit court's summary dismissal of his Rule 32 Ala. R. Crim. P., petition for postconviction relief.
In 2009, Wimbley was indicted for and convicted of two counts of capital murder -- one count for killing Connie Ray Wheat during the commission of a robbery, see § 13A-5-40(a)(2), Ala. Code 1975, and one count for killing Wheat during the commission of an arson, see § 13A-5-40(a)(9), Ala. Code 1975. At trial, the State's evidence showed the following:
Wimbley v. State, 191 So.3d 176, 192-94 (Ala.Crim.App.2014) (plurality opinion). After the jury found Wimbley guilty of both counts of capital murder, it recommended that he be sentenced to death.[1] The trial court followed that recommendation.
On December 19, 2014, this Court affirmed Wimbley's capital-murder convictions and death sentences, and, on September 25, 2015, the Alabama Supreme Court denied his petition for a writ of certiorari. On May 31, 2016, however, the Supreme Court of the United States vacated this Court's judgment and remanded Wimbley's case to this Court for further consideration in light of its decision in Hurst v. Florida, 577 U.S. 91 (2016). See Wimbley v. Alabama, 578 U.S. 1009 (2016). This Court did so, and, on December 16, 2016, this Court again affirmed Wimbley's capital-murder convictions and death sentences. See Wimbley v. State, 238 So.3d 1268 (Ala.Crim.App.2016). Wimbley again petitioned the Alabama Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. The Alabama Supreme Court denied his petition on May 19, 2017. This Court issued a certificate of judgment that same day, making Wimbley's capital-murder convictions and death sentences final. Wimbley then petitioned the Supreme Court of the United States for a writ of certiorari. The Supreme Court of the United States denied his petition on October 30, 2017. See Wimbley v. Alabama, 138 S.Ct. 385, 199 L.Ed.2d 286 (2017).
On May 21, 2018, Wimbley filed a Rule 32 petition challenging his capital-murder convictions and death sentence. (C. 9-127.) In his petition, Wimbley alleged that his trial counsel were ineffective during the "culpability phase of trial" (C. 33-86), "during the penalty phase of trial" (C. 86-119), and "during the sentencing phase of the trial" (C. 119-20). Wimbley also alleged that the State had "violated [his] rights to due process of law … when it failed to disclose to [him] that one of its crucial witnesses had reasons to falsify her testimony against him." (C. 120-24.)
On September 9, 2018, the State moved to dismiss Wimbley's petition. (C. 151-250.)
Wimbley then moved the...
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting