Case Law Z.B. v. State

Z.B. v. State

Document Cited Authorities (3) Cited in (1) Related

James Law Firm, by: Michael Kiel Kaiser and William O. "Bill" James, Jr., for appellant.

Leslie Rutledge, Att’y Gen., by: Brooke Jackson Gasaway, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

N. MARK KLAPPENBACH, Judge

ZB appeals from the order of the Lonoke County Circuit Court denying his petition to terminate his obligation to register as a sex offender. He contends that the court misinterpreted the relevant statute, and the State concedes error. We agree with the parties; accordingly, we reverse and remand.

ZB was adjudicated a juvenile delinquent for the offense of second-degree sexual assault in February 2009. He was subsequently ordered to register as a sex offender. In June 2019, he filed a petition to terminate his obligation to register as a sex offender. ZB argued that because he was now older than twenty-one years of age and more than ten years had passed since his adjudication, he was entitled to relief without the presentation of evidence pursuant to subsection (j) of the juvenile sex-offender-registration statute, Arkansas Code Annotated section 9-27-356 (Repl. 2015). The State argued that ZB was entitled to relief only upon proof by a preponderance of the evidence that he does not pose a threat to the safety of others. ZB responded that the State’s position renders subsection (j) superfluous. The circuit court agreed with the State and found that ZB did not present evidence to meet his burden.

Arkansas Code Annotated section 9-27-356 addresses removal from the registry:

(h) The juvenile may petition the court to have his or her name removed from the sex offender register at any time while the court has jurisdiction over the juvenile or when the juvenile turns twenty-one (21) years of age, whichever is later.
(i) The juvenile division of circuit court judge shall order the juvenile’s name removed from the sex offender register upon proof by a preponderance of the evidence that the juvenile does not pose a threat to the safety of others.
(j) If the court does not order the juvenile’s name removed from the sex offender register, the juvenile shall remain on the sex offender register for ten (10) years from the last date on which the juvenile was adjudicated a delinquent or found guilty as an adult for a sex offense or until the juvenile turns twenty-one (21) years of age, whichever is longer.

Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-356.

ZB argues that the circuit court misinterpreted the statute by applying the standard in subsection (i) to a case in which both conditions in subsection (j) are met. He contends that subsection (j) applies when a court does not order the juvenile’s name removed pursuant to subsections (h) and (i). Because he has turned twenty-one years of age and more than ten years have passed from the last date he was adjudicated a delinquent or found guilty as an adult for a sex offense, he contends that he was entitled to removal from the registry. The State now agrees with ZB’s interpretation of the statute.

The correct application and interpretation...

1 cases
Document | Arkansas Court of Appeals – 2020
Raiteri v. Nowak
"..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1 cases
Document | Arkansas Court of Appeals – 2020
Raiteri v. Nowak
"..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex