Sign Up for Vincent AI
Zoellner v. City of Arcata, Case No. 18-cv-04471-EMC
Elizabeth Azadeh Zareh, Zareh and Associates, Ali R. Yousefi, Law Offices of Ali Yousefi, P.C., San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff.
Dale L. Allen, Jr., Patrick Daniel Moriarty, Maria Nozzolino, Kevin Patrick Allen, John Braden Robinson, Allen, Glaessner, Hazelwood & Werth LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant City of Arcata.
Patrick Daniel Moriarty, Maria Nozzolino, John Braden Robinson, Allen, Glaessner, Hazelwood and Werth, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants Tom Chapman, Karen Diemer, Sofia Pereira, Todd Dokweiler, Eric Losey, Devin Nilsen, Krystle Arminio, Jacob McKenzie.
John Braden Robinson, Maria Nozzolino, Patrick Daniel Moriarty, Allen, Glaessner, Hazelwood & Werth, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants Brian Ahearn, Richard Ehle.
Margaret Mary Fleming, DA Humboldt County, Eureka, CA, for Defendant DA Maggie Fleming.
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiff Kyle C. Zoellner has filed a civil rights action against the City of Arcata and several employees of the City Police Department (including Chief Thomas Chapman, Det. Sgt. Todd Dokweiler, Sgt. Eric Losey, Officer Devin Nilsen, Officer Krystle Arminio, and Officer Jacob McKenzie). Mr. Zoellner was arrested by the City police on April 15, 2017, for the murder of Josiah Lawson. He was charged with the crime on April 19, 2017. On May 5, 2017, following a preliminary hearing, the state court dismissed the charges against Mr. Zoellner for lack of probable cause. Mr. Zoellner has asserted causes of action under both federal and state law, including but not limited to unlawful arrest and malicious prosecution. Currently pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
Having considered the parties’ briefs and accompanying submissions, as well as the oral argument of counsel, the Court hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ motion.
The evidence submitted by the parties in conjunction with the motion for summary judgment reflects as follows.
4/15/2017. Mr. Lawson was killed at a party in the City early in the morning, around 3:00 a.m. He was stabbed. The first officer to arrive at the scene was Officer Nilsen. Soon thereafter, Officer McKenzie and Officer Arminio arrived at the scene. Officer Arminio served as the watch commander at the scene.
Defendants have provided a copy of the MAV (mobile audio video) recording from Officer Nilsen's car. See also Nilsen Decl. ¶ 4 (). The recording shows only the interior of the car but still has value because of the audio. It lasts about two hours. Defendants’ expert, Brian Medeiros, prepared a report which provides an "index" to the main events on the recording. See Medeiros Decl., Ex. A (Rpt. at 12 et seq. ).
As indicated by the recording, within minutes after arriving at the scene, Officer Nilsen put Mr. Zoellner in handcuffs and in the back of his police car. This was also about the time that Officer McKenzie and Officer Arminio arrived at the scene. See McKenzie Decl. ¶ 4 (); Arminio Decl. ¶ 4 ().
After Mr. Zoellner was put in the police car, he stayed there for close to two hours before he was taken to the hospital for injuries he had sustained during one or two fights involving Mr. Lawson. During the time Mr. Zoellner was waiting in the police car, the police did some additional investigation, although Mr. Zoellner contends that the investigation was not adequate. At one point during the wait (about an hour and twenty minutes into the recording), Officer Nilsen spoke to someone on the phone. During this conversation, Officer Nilsen noted that he could not remember whether a witness, Mr. Wright, said he saw Mr. Zoellner stab Mr. Lawson or simply made an assumption that Mr. Zoellner had stabbed Mr. Lawson. It is not clear to whom Officer Nilsen was speaking. According to Mr. Zoellner, Officer Nilsen was speaking to Officer Arminio and/or Det. Sgt. Dokweiler.
After Mr. Zoellner was taken to the hospital and medically cleared, he was taken to the Police Department where Det. Sgt. Dokweiler interviewed him. See Dokweiler Decl. ¶ 7. Det Sgt. Dokwiler had been assigned to lead the investigation of the homicide. See Dokweiler Decl. ¶ 3.
Officer Nilsen prepared a police report related to the events that same day. See Zareh Decl., Exs. 3, 6 (police report). In his report, Officer Nilsen noted, inter alia , as follows.
4/16/2017. The day after the homicide, Det. Sgt. Dokweiler prepared a probable cause statement which was Dokweiler Decl. ¶ 8. The statement is very short, simply noting as follows: Docket No. 201-8 (probable cause statement). A state court judge signed the statement of probable cause for an arrest without a warrant, and Mr. Zoellner stayed in custody based on the warrant that the judge signed until the DA charged him with murder on 4/19/2017. See Dokweiler Decl. ¶¶ 8, 11.
4/17/2017. The Police Department interviewed additional witnesses, including but not limited to Mr. Martinez who had been one of the attendees at the party. See Zareh Decl., Exs. 2, 5 (police report, dated 4/19/2017); Zareh Decl., Ex. 8 (charging summary). Det....
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting