Case Law Hengle v. Treppa

Hengle v. Treppa

Document Cited Authorities (104) Cited in (41) Related

ARGUED: Rakesh N. Kilaru, WILKINSON STEKLOFF LLP, Washington, D.C.; Matthew E. Price, JENNER & BLOCK, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellants. Matthew W. H. Wessler, GUPTA WESSLER PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. ON BRIEF: James Rosenthal, Kosta Stojilkovic, Beth Wilkinson, Matthew Skanchy, Betsy Henthorne, Jaclyn Delligatti, WILKINSON STEKLOFF LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellants. Leonard Anthony Bennett, CONSUMER LITIGATION ASSOCIATES, P.C., Newport News, Virginia; Kristi Cahoon Kelly, Andrew J. Guzzo, Casey Shannon Nash, KELLY GUZZO PLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees. Brian C. Rabbitt, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Teresa A. Wallbaum, Assistant Chief, Organized Crime and Gang Section, Criminal Division, Jeffrey Bossert Clark, Assistant Attorney General, Eric Grant, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Brian C. Toth, Environment and Natural Resources Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Amicus United States of America. Hector Balderas, Attorney General, Tania Maestas, Chief Deputy Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW MEXICO, Santa Fe, New Mexico; William H. Hurd, TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Amicus State of New Mexico. Bruce A. Finzen, Minneapolis, Minnesota, Brendan V. Johnson, Timothy W. Billion, ROBINS KAPLAN LLP, Sioux Falls, South Dakota; Sarah J. Auchterlonie, BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK LLP, Denver, Colorado, for Amicus Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Consumer Financial Services Regulatory Commission. Jonodev Chaudhuri, Washington, D.C., E. King Poor, Chicago, Illinois, Nicole Simmons, QUARLES & BRADY LLP, Phoenix, Arizona, for Amici The Native American Finance Officers Association, National Congress of American Indians, National Center for American Indian Economic Development, National Indian Gaming Association, and Association on American Indian Affairs.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, AND RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge Rushing wrote the opinion, in which Judge Niemeyer and Judge King joined.

RUSHING, Circuit Judge:

The named plaintiffs in this case, all Virginia consumers, received short-term loans from online lenders affiliated with a federally recognized Native American tribe. Eventually the borrowers defaulted and brought a putative class action against tribal officials and two non-members affiliated with the tribal lenders to avoid repaying their debts, which they alleged violated Virginia and federal law. The defendants moved to compel arbitration under the terms of the loan agreements and to dismiss the complaint on various grounds.

The district court denied the motions to compel arbitration and, with one significant exception relevant here, denied the motions to dismiss. Four of those rulings are now before us in this interlocutory appeal. First, the district court found the arbitration provision unenforceable as a prospective waiver of the borrowers’ federal rights. Second, the district court denied the tribal officials’ motion to dismiss the claims against them on the ground of tribal sovereign immunity. Third, the district court held the loan agreements’ choice of tribal law unenforceable as a violation of Virginia's strong public policy against unregulated lending of usurious loans. Fourth, the district court dismissed the federal claim against the tribal officials, ruling that the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) does not authorize private plaintiffs to sue for injunctive relief. For the reasons explained below, we affirm all four rulings on appeal.

I.

The Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake (the Tribe) is a federally recognized Native American tribe in northern California. Through its Tribal Executive Council, the Tribe started an online lending business consisting of four incorporated lending portfolios: Golden Valley Lending, Inc., Silver Cloud Financial, Inc., Mountain Summit Financial, Inc., and ...

5 cases
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit – 2021
PG Publ'g, Inc. v. Newspaper Guild of Pittsburgh
"..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Maryland – 2022
Jones v. Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
"...clause with the same arguments it employs to contest the enforceability of the overall arbitration agreement.” Hengle v. Treppa, 19 F.4th 324, 335 (4th Cir. 2021). “[C]ourts have construed a party's argument that the ‘delegation clause suffers from the same defect as the arbitration provisi..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Southern District of West Virginia – 2023
United States v. Gould
"...dicta from the Supreme Court," "particularly when the supposed dicta is recent and not enfeebled by later statements." Hengle v. Treppa, 19 F.4th 324, 347 (4th Cir. 2021) (internal citations omitted) (noting that "[t]he lengthy discussion of alternative remedies . . . was important, if not ..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Western District of Virginia – 2023
Fitzgerald v. Wildcat
"...specifically, the court must evaluate the validity of the delegation 'before ordering compliance' with the clause." Hengle v. Treppa, 19 F.4th 324, 335 (4th Cir. 2021) (quoting Rent-A-Ctr., W., Inc. v. Jackson, 561 U.S. 63, 71, 130 S.Ct. 2772, 177 L.Ed.2d 403 (2010)). A party may "contest t..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Virginia – 2023
Williams v. Big Picture Loans, LLC
"...waiver provisions in the choice of forum clause in the loan agreements do not render the tribal choice of law clause unenforceable; and• Hengle v. Treppa is distinguishable and not controlling.Second, Martorello opposed the requested partial summary judgment by claiming that he was entitled..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit – 2021
PG Publ'g, Inc. v. Newspaper Guild of Pittsburgh
"..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Maryland – 2022
Jones v. Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
"...clause with the same arguments it employs to contest the enforceability of the overall arbitration agreement.” Hengle v. Treppa, 19 F.4th 324, 335 (4th Cir. 2021). “[C]ourts have construed a party's argument that the ‘delegation clause suffers from the same defect as the arbitration provisi..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Southern District of West Virginia – 2023
United States v. Gould
"...dicta from the Supreme Court," "particularly when the supposed dicta is recent and not enfeebled by later statements." Hengle v. Treppa, 19 F.4th 324, 347 (4th Cir. 2021) (internal citations omitted) (noting that "[t]he lengthy discussion of alternative remedies . . . was important, if not ..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Western District of Virginia – 2023
Fitzgerald v. Wildcat
"...specifically, the court must evaluate the validity of the delegation 'before ordering compliance' with the clause." Hengle v. Treppa, 19 F.4th 324, 335 (4th Cir. 2021) (quoting Rent-A-Ctr., W., Inc. v. Jackson, 561 U.S. 63, 71, 130 S.Ct. 2772, 177 L.Ed.2d 403 (2010)). A party may "contest t..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Virginia – 2023
Williams v. Big Picture Loans, LLC
"...waiver provisions in the choice of forum clause in the loan agreements do not render the tribal choice of law clause unenforceable; and• Hengle v. Treppa is distinguishable and not controlling.Second, Martorello opposed the requested partial summary judgment by claiming that he was entitled..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex