Case Law In re Carlson, A18-1425

In re Carlson, A18-1425

Document Cited in (4) Related
ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Paul Francis Carlson has committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline—namely, as one of the partners in a law firm, failing to supervise non-lawyer support staff to ensure that the required trust account books and records were maintained, that the trust account records that were maintained were accurate, and that client funds were deposited into trust; failing to safeguard client funds; commingling earned fees in the trust account; and negligently misappropriating client funds. See Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.15(a), 1.15(b), 1.15(c)(3), 1.15(c)(5), 1.15(h), and 5.3(a).

Respondent and the Director have entered into a stipulation for discipline. In it, respondent waives his procedural rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional

Responsibility (RLPR), waives his right to answer the petition, and unconditionally admits the allegations of the petition. The parties jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is a public reprimand followed by 2 years of probation.

This court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly recommended disposition.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Respondent Paul Francis Carlson is publicly reprimanded.

2. Respondent shall pay $900 in costs pursuant to Rule 24(a), RLPR.

3. Respondent is placed on probation for 2 years, subject to the following terms and conditions:

a. Respondent shall cooperate fully with the Director’s Office in its efforts to monitor compliance with this probation. Respondent shall promptly respond to the Director’s correspondence by its due date. Respondent shall provide to the Director a current mailing address and shall immediately notify the Director of any change of address. Respondent shall cooperate with the Director’s investigation of any allegations of unprofessional conduct that may come to the Director’s attention. Upon the Director’s request, respondent shall provide authorization for release of information and documentation to verify compliance with the terms of this probation.
b. Respondent shall abide by the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct.
c. If, at any time during his
...
2 cases
Document | Minnesota Supreme Court – 2020
In re Lieber
"... ... See, e.g. , In re Carlson , 917 N.W.2d 774 (Minn. 2018) (order) (ordering a public reprimand and 2 years of probation for an attorney who negligently misappropriated client ... "
Document | Minnesota Supreme Court – 2018
In re Van Bruggen, A18-1424
"..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial
2 books and journal articles
Document | Minnesota Legal Ethics: A Treatise (MSBA)
Rules 5.1-5.3 Lawyers' Supervisory Duties
"...failed to supervise nonlawyer staff, resulting in insufficient books and records, commingling, inadvertent shortages, etc. In re Carlson, 917 N.W.2d 774 (Minn. 2018); In re Van Bruggen, 917 N.W.2d 772 (Mem) (Minn. 2018). Reprimand and probation were imposed on a lawyer for delegation to and..."
Document | Minnesota Legal Ethics: A Treatise (MSBA)
Rule 5.4 Nonlawyers and Law Firms
"...to to supervise nonlawyer staff, resulting in insufficient books and records, commingling, inadvertent shortages, etc. In re Carlson, 917 N.W.2d 774 (Minn. 2018); In re Van Bruggen, 917 N.W.2d 772 (Mem) (Minn. 2018). rafting a revocable trust agreement which placed her home in trust. The wi..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 books and journal articles
Document | Minnesota Legal Ethics: A Treatise (MSBA)
Rules 5.1-5.3 Lawyers' Supervisory Duties
"...failed to supervise nonlawyer staff, resulting in insufficient books and records, commingling, inadvertent shortages, etc. In re Carlson, 917 N.W.2d 774 (Minn. 2018); In re Van Bruggen, 917 N.W.2d 772 (Mem) (Minn. 2018). Reprimand and probation were imposed on a lawyer for delegation to and..."
Document | Minnesota Legal Ethics: A Treatise (MSBA)
Rule 5.4 Nonlawyers and Law Firms
"...to to supervise nonlawyer staff, resulting in insufficient books and records, commingling, inadvertent shortages, etc. In re Carlson, 917 N.W.2d 774 (Minn. 2018); In re Van Bruggen, 917 N.W.2d 772 (Mem) (Minn. 2018). rafting a revocable trust agreement which placed her home in trust. The wi..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 cases
Document | Minnesota Supreme Court – 2020
In re Lieber
"... ... See, e.g. , In re Carlson , 917 N.W.2d 774 (Minn. 2018) (order) (ordering a public reprimand and 2 years of probation for an attorney who negligently misappropriated client ... "
Document | Minnesota Supreme Court – 2018
In re Van Bruggen, A18-1424
"..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex