Case Law In re Daniel B.

In re Daniel B.

Document Cited in (3) Related

Daniel P. Moskowitz, Jamaica, N.Y., for appellant.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Larry A. Sonnenshein and Deborah A. Brenner of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

Appeal from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Fran L. Lubow, J.), dated March 15, 2013. The order of disposition, insofar as appealed from, upon Daniel B.'s consent, directed his placement in a nonsecure detention facility with the Administration for Children's Services for a period of up to 18 months, upon adjudicating him to be a juvenile delinquent.

Motion by the respondent, inter alia, to dismiss the appeal on the ground that no appeal lies from an order entered upon the consent of the appealing party. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated December 10, 2014, that branch of the motion which is to dismiss the appeal on the ground that no appeal lies from an order entered upon the consent of the appealing party was held in abeyance and referred to the panel of Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission thereof.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the submission of the appeal, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to dismiss the appeal from the order of disposition on the ground that no appeal lies from an order entered upon the consent of the appealing party is...

5 cases
Document | New York Supreme Court – 2017
U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. McMullin
"..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2018
Carr v. Haas
"... ... Initially, plaintiff's appeal from Supreme Court's August 2017 order must be dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order entered upon consent (see CPLR 5511 ; Matter of O'Sullivan v. Schebilski, 138 A.D.3d 1170, 1172, 30 N.Y.S.3d 351 [2016] ; Matter of Daniel B., 127 A.D.3d 1178, 1179, 5 N.Y.S.3d 911 [2015] ; 80 N.Y.S.3d 718   Cooper v. Number 535 Park Ave., 73 A.D.3d 433, 434, 899 N.Y.S.2d 599 [2010] ; United Tit. Agency, LLC v. Surfside–3 Mar., Inc., 65 A.D.3d 1134, 1134, 885 N.Y.S.2d 334 [2009] ). As the August 2017 order discontinued the instant ... "
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2015
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Erobobo
"..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Northern District of California – 2017
Rivac v. Ndex W., LLC
"..."
Document | Washington Court of Appeals – 2017
Lopez v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.
"..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | New York Supreme Court – 2017
U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. McMullin
"..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2018
Carr v. Haas
"... ... Initially, plaintiff's appeal from Supreme Court's August 2017 order must be dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order entered upon consent (see CPLR 5511 ; Matter of O'Sullivan v. Schebilski, 138 A.D.3d 1170, 1172, 30 N.Y.S.3d 351 [2016] ; Matter of Daniel B., 127 A.D.3d 1178, 1179, 5 N.Y.S.3d 911 [2015] ; 80 N.Y.S.3d 718   Cooper v. Number 535 Park Ave., 73 A.D.3d 433, 434, 899 N.Y.S.2d 599 [2010] ; United Tit. Agency, LLC v. Surfside–3 Mar., Inc., 65 A.D.3d 1134, 1134, 885 N.Y.S.2d 334 [2009] ). As the August 2017 order discontinued the instant ... "
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2015
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Erobobo
"..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Northern District of California – 2017
Rivac v. Ndex W., LLC
"..."
Document | Washington Court of Appeals – 2017
Lopez v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.
"..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex