Case Law Inglis et al. v. British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General) et al.,

Inglis et al. v. British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General) et al.,

Document Cited Authorities (74) Cited in (18) Related
5 cases
Document | Supreme Court of Canada – 2022
R. v. Sharma,
"...2000 SCC 10, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 207; R. v. Le, 2019 SCC 34, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 692; Inglis v. British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety), 2013 BCSC 2309, 298 C.R.R. (2d) 35; Vriend v. Alberta, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 493; R. v. Lloyd, 2016 SCC 13, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 130; Newfoundland (Treasury Board) v. N..."
Document | Federal Court (Canada) – 2014
Canadian Doctors for Refugee Care et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., (2014) 458 F.T.R. 1 (FC)
"...to. [para. 520]. Inglis et al. v. British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General) et al., [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2309; 2013 BCSC 2309, refd to. [para. 523]. Tanudjaja et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 5410; 2013 ONSC 5410, refd to. [para. 524]..."
Document | Federal Court (Canada) – 2014
Médecins canadiens pour les soins aux réfugiés c. Canada (Procureur général),
"...c. Alberta, 2007 CSC 31, [2007] 2 R.C.S. 673; R. c. Askov, [1990] 2 R.C.S. 1199; Inglis v. British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety), 2013 BCSC 2309, 298 C.R.R. (2d) 35; Auton (Tutrice à l’instance de) c. Colombie- Britannique (Procureur général), 2004 CSC 78, [2004..."
Document | Court of Appeal (Alberta) – 2021
AC and JF v Alberta, 2021 ABCA 24
"...appeal being a “fundamental principle of justice”. (c) The trial level decision in Inglis v British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety), 2013 BCSC 2309 at para. 500, 298 CRR (2d) 35 finds that “arbitrariness”, “overbreadth”, and “gross disproportionality” were the principles of fundamental..."
Document | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) – 2014
British Columbia/Yukon Association of Drug War Survivors v. Abbotsford (City),
"...failing which a remedy for unconstitutional government action may be sought: see Inglis v. British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety) , 2013 BCSC 2309 [ Inglis ] at paras. 355 - 356. [90] It is clear that the so-called displacement tactics are not alleged to have been taken without, or in..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial
5 books and journal articles
Document | Fundamental Justice: Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Second Edition – 2019
Table of cases
"...44 .................................................................... 134, 136 Inglis v British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety), 2013 BCSC 2309 ........11, 61 Insurance Corp of British Columbia v Suska, 2008 BCSC 1204 ......................... 27 Irwin Toy Ltd v Quebec (AG), [1989] 1..."
Document | Sentencing in Canada – 2020
Table of cases
"...Inglis v British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety), 2013 BCSC 2309 .................... 254 441 442 | Sentencing in Canada JKL v The Queen, [2011] NTCCA 7 .................................................................................................424 Krieger v Law Society of Alberta..."
Document | Fundamental Justice: Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Second Edition – 2019
Engaging Section 7
"...below in this chapter. 187 Dixon , above note 9. 188 Ibid at para 58. 189 Inglis v British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety) , 2013 BCSC 2309. 190 Ibid at paras 347–60. 191 Correction Act Regulation , BC Reg 58/2005, s 38(2). FUNDAMENTAL JUSTICE 62 not decide) that if such a program had ..."
Document | Vol. 60 Núm. 1, September - September 2014 – 2014
Contesting expertise in prison law.
"...issues in the case rest on "philosophical, political and social considerations which are not capable of 'scientific proof" (ibid at para 67). The difference between Justice Gonthier and the majority--as to what is required to justify a rights infringement--is a central issue for the project of ge..."
Document | Fundamental Justice: Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Second Edition – 2019
Introduction
"...and then proceeded under s 15: see, for example, Inglis v British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General) , 2013 BCSC 2309 at paras 496–99. FUNDA MENTAL JUSTICE 12 guaranteed by section 7 is distinct from those guaranteed by section 15. It is entirely possible for a law t..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 books and journal articles
Document | Fundamental Justice: Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Second Edition – 2019
Table of cases
"...44 .................................................................... 134, 136 Inglis v British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety), 2013 BCSC 2309 ........11, 61 Insurance Corp of British Columbia v Suska, 2008 BCSC 1204 ......................... 27 Irwin Toy Ltd v Quebec (AG), [1989] 1..."
Document | Sentencing in Canada – 2020
Table of cases
"...Inglis v British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety), 2013 BCSC 2309 .................... 254 441 442 | Sentencing in Canada JKL v The Queen, [2011] NTCCA 7 .................................................................................................424 Krieger v Law Society of Alberta..."
Document | Fundamental Justice: Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Second Edition – 2019
Engaging Section 7
"...below in this chapter. 187 Dixon , above note 9. 188 Ibid at para 58. 189 Inglis v British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety) , 2013 BCSC 2309. 190 Ibid at paras 347–60. 191 Correction Act Regulation , BC Reg 58/2005, s 38(2). FUNDAMENTAL JUSTICE 62 not decide) that if such a program had ..."
Document | Vol. 60 Núm. 1, September - September 2014 – 2014
Contesting expertise in prison law.
"...issues in the case rest on "philosophical, political and social considerations which are not capable of 'scientific proof" (ibid at para 67). The difference between Justice Gonthier and the majority--as to what is required to justify a rights infringement--is a central issue for the project of ge..."
Document | Fundamental Justice: Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Second Edition – 2019
Introduction
"...and then proceeded under s 15: see, for example, Inglis v British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General) , 2013 BCSC 2309 at paras 496–99. FUNDA MENTAL JUSTICE 12 guaranteed by section 7 is distinct from those guaranteed by section 15. It is entirely possible for a law t..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | Supreme Court of Canada – 2022
R. v. Sharma,
"...2000 SCC 10, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 207; R. v. Le, 2019 SCC 34, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 692; Inglis v. British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety), 2013 BCSC 2309, 298 C.R.R. (2d) 35; Vriend v. Alberta, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 493; R. v. Lloyd, 2016 SCC 13, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 130; Newfoundland (Treasury Board) v. N..."
Document | Federal Court (Canada) – 2014
Canadian Doctors for Refugee Care et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., (2014) 458 F.T.R. 1 (FC)
"...to. [para. 520]. Inglis et al. v. British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General) et al., [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2309; 2013 BCSC 2309, refd to. [para. 523]. Tanudjaja et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 5410; 2013 ONSC 5410, refd to. [para. 524]..."
Document | Federal Court (Canada) – 2014
Médecins canadiens pour les soins aux réfugiés c. Canada (Procureur général),
"...c. Alberta, 2007 CSC 31, [2007] 2 R.C.S. 673; R. c. Askov, [1990] 2 R.C.S. 1199; Inglis v. British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety), 2013 BCSC 2309, 298 C.R.R. (2d) 35; Auton (Tutrice à l’instance de) c. Colombie- Britannique (Procureur général), 2004 CSC 78, [2004..."
Document | Court of Appeal (Alberta) – 2021
AC and JF v Alberta, 2021 ABCA 24
"...appeal being a “fundamental principle of justice”. (c) The trial level decision in Inglis v British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety), 2013 BCSC 2309 at para. 500, 298 CRR (2d) 35 finds that “arbitrariness”, “overbreadth”, and “gross disproportionality” were the principles of fundamental..."
Document | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) – 2014
British Columbia/Yukon Association of Drug War Survivors v. Abbotsford (City),
"...failing which a remedy for unconstitutional government action may be sought: see Inglis v. British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety) , 2013 BCSC 2309 [ Inglis ] at paras. 355 - 356. [90] It is clear that the so-called displacement tactics are not alleged to have been taken without, or in..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex