Sign Up for Vincent AI
Kellar v. Moore, 1D01-4008.
Petitioner, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Caryl Kilinski, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
The trial court reached the right result for the wrong reason. "Mandamus is a narrow, extraordinary writ used to coerce an official to perform a clear legal duty." Sica v. Singletary, 714 So.2d 1111, 1112 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). "Although mandamus is a legal remedy, the granting of the writ is governed by equitable principles." Shevin ex rel. State v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 333 So.2d 9, 12 (Fla.1976). Shevin, 333 So.2d at 12. Other adequate legal remedies do exist here. See, e.g., Abbott v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 783 So.2d 1213, 1214-15 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
4 cases
Point Conversions, LLC v. Pfeffer & Marin Holdings, LLC
"...there is an adequate remedy at law, so relief by mandamus is unavailable unless no other adequate remedy exists." Kellar v. Moore, 820 So. 2d 1015, 1016 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted).2 These firmly established requirements have been articulated for hun..."
K.G. Mother of N.G. v. Fla. Dep't of Children
"...of law or that there is no adequate legal remedy. See Egan v. City of Miami, 130 Fla. 465, 178 So. 132 (1938); Kellar v. Moore, 820 So.2d 1015, 1016 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). A petitioner can demonstrate a departure from the essential requirements of the law by showing “that the trial court made..."
Fuller v. Truncale
"...v. Smithers, 743 So.2d 605, 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). 2 See Egan v. City of Miami, 130 Fla. 465, 178 So. 132 (1938); Kellar v. Moore, 820 So.2d 1015, 1016 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). 3 See State v. Smith, 951 So.2d 954, 958 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). 4 See Taylor v. TGI Friday's, Inc., 16 So.3d 312, 313 ..."
A.G. v. Fla. Dep't of Children
"...of law or that there is no adequate legal remedy. See Egan v. City of Miami, 130 Fla. 465, 178 So. 132, 133 (1938); Kellar v. Moore, 820 So.2d 1015, 1016 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). A petitioner can demonstrate a departure from the essential requirements of the law by showing “that the trial court..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
4 cases
Point Conversions, LLC v. Pfeffer & Marin Holdings, LLC
"...there is an adequate remedy at law, so relief by mandamus is unavailable unless no other adequate remedy exists." Kellar v. Moore, 820 So. 2d 1015, 1016 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted).2 These firmly established requirements have been articulated for hun..."
K.G. Mother of N.G. v. Fla. Dep't of Children
"...of law or that there is no adequate legal remedy. See Egan v. City of Miami, 130 Fla. 465, 178 So. 132 (1938); Kellar v. Moore, 820 So.2d 1015, 1016 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). A petitioner can demonstrate a departure from the essential requirements of the law by showing “that the trial court made..."
Fuller v. Truncale
"...v. Smithers, 743 So.2d 605, 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). 2 See Egan v. City of Miami, 130 Fla. 465, 178 So. 132 (1938); Kellar v. Moore, 820 So.2d 1015, 1016 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). 3 See State v. Smith, 951 So.2d 954, 958 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). 4 See Taylor v. TGI Friday's, Inc., 16 So.3d 312, 313 ..."
A.G. v. Fla. Dep't of Children
"...of law or that there is no adequate legal remedy. See Egan v. City of Miami, 130 Fla. 465, 178 So. 132, 133 (1938); Kellar v. Moore, 820 So.2d 1015, 1016 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). A petitioner can demonstrate a departure from the essential requirements of the law by showing “that the trial court..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting