Case Law People ex rel. Soto v. Bd. of Parole

People ex rel. Soto v. Bd. of Parole

Document Cited Authorities (2) Cited in (1) Related

Anselmo Soto Jr., Utica, appellant pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Frank Brady of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Clark, Pritzker, Reynolds Fitzgerald and Ceresia, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Pritzker, J. Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Michael R. Cuevas, J.), entered September 7, 2021 in Franklin County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, after a hearing.

In 2020, petitioner, who was on parole release, was arrested for alleged threatening behavior and received an appearance ticket. Petitioner was nevertheless detained in police custody pending the approval of a parole violation warrant. A parole violation warrant was subsequently issued and, following an ensuing parole violation hearing, petitioner was found to have violated his parole and was ordered held until the maximum expiration of his sentence – which decision was affirmed upon administrative appeal. Thereafter, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 70 proceeding, alleging that his temporary detention prior to obtaining a parole violation warrant was illegal, and sought immediate release as well as dismissal of the subsequent parole revocation proceeding. Following a hearing, Supreme Court, among other things, denied the application, finding that, although the temporary warrantless detention of petitioner during the few hours in which a parole violation warrant was obtained was unauthorized, the statutory violation did not warrant immediate release or dismissal of the parole revocation proceeding....

3 cases
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2022
People v. Ripley
"..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2022
Indus. Med. Assocs., P.C. v. Comm'r of Labor (In re Wolff)
"..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2024
People v. N.Y. Dep't of Corr. & Cmty. Supervision
"...from custody. As petitioner is no longer in custody, habeas corpus relief is not available (see People ex rel. Soto v. Board of Parole, 210 A.D.3d 1223, 1224, 177 N.Y.S.3d 805 [3d Dept. 2022]; People ex rel. McAdoo v. Taylor, 31 A.D.3d 847, 848, 818 N.Y.S.2d 847 [3d Dept. 2006]). Further, t..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2022
People v. Ripley
"..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2022
Indus. Med. Assocs., P.C. v. Comm'r of Labor (In re Wolff)
"..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2024
People v. N.Y. Dep't of Corr. & Cmty. Supervision
"...from custody. As petitioner is no longer in custody, habeas corpus relief is not available (see People ex rel. Soto v. Board of Parole, 210 A.D.3d 1223, 1224, 177 N.Y.S.3d 805 [3d Dept. 2022]; People ex rel. McAdoo v. Taylor, 31 A.D.3d 847, 848, 818 N.Y.S.2d 847 [3d Dept. 2006]). Further, t..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex