Case Law People v. Luna

People v. Luna

Document Cited Authorities (9) Cited in (3) Related

Arthur G. Dunn, Troy, for appellant.

P. David Soares, District Attorney, Albany (Erin LaValley of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Aarons, J.P., Pritzker, Reynolds Fitzgerald, Ceresia and Fisher, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Pritzker, J. Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Breslin, J.) rendered May 2, 2017 in Albany County, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of tampering with a witness in the third degree.

In September 2015, defendant was arrested and indicted for various felonies related to drug trafficking for which he faced a maximum sentence of 25 years to life in prison. Geraldo Torres, a codefendant for the drug trafficking conspiracy, was also arrested for his part in the scheme and, while awaiting trial, was incarcerated in the cell next door to defendant in the Albany County jail. Torres accepted a plea offer wherein he would plead guilty to conspiracy in the second degree and receive a sentence of 8 to 25 years in prison in satisfaction of the various crimes charged in exchange for his cooperation in the trials of his coconspirators, including defendant. Thereafter, in November 2015, defendant allegedly made a statement to Torres which Torres understood to be a threat of harm to himself or his family if he continued to cooperate in the People's case against defendant. Defendant was then charged by indictment with intimidating a victim or witness in the third degree and tampering with a witness in the third degree. Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of tampering with a witness in the third degree, for which he was sentenced to a prison term of 1 to 4 years to run consecutively to any other sentence previously imposed. Defendant appeals.

Defendant contends that his conviction is not supported by legally sufficient evidence and is against the weight of the evidence. "A person is guilty of tampering with a witness in the third degree when, knowing that a person is about to be called as a witness in a criminal proceeding[,] ... [h]e [or she] wrongfully compels or attempts to compel such person to absent himself [or herself] from, or otherwise to avoid or seek to avoid appearing or testifying at such proceeding by means of instilling in him [or her] a fear that the actor will cause physical injury to such person or another person" ( Penal Law § 215.11[1] ).

At trial, the People called Torres, who testified that he has been incarcerated at the jail in accordance with his guilty plea for conspiracy in the second degree and that the plea agreement required his cooperation in the People's case against his coconspirators, including defendant, in exchange for an agreed-upon prison sentence. Torres testified that when he told defendant that he had given law enforcement information regarding the drug trafficking crimes, defendant had replied that Torres had to "pay for this shit." Defendant told Torres that Torres was "worse than all of [the coconspirators], if I cannot get you[,] I am going to get one of your family members"; Torres averred that "going to get" meant "[k]illing" and that defendant appeared angry at that time. Torres reported that, even though defendant's threat scared him, he testified against defendant at defendant's trial on the drug trafficking charge. When asked whether he was receiving any benefit for testifying against defendant as to the present charges, Torres replied "[n]o, but I hope." He conceded that he had not reported defendant's threat against him to anyone in the jail and that he told the district attorney's office of that threat months before they began preparing him to testify at defendant's trial on the underlying drug charges. Torres affirmed that he had stopped attending church services at the jail as a result of defendant's threat in an attempt to "put some distance" between them. Torres testified that his present placement in the jail is in protective custody.

Another incarcerated individual testified that he had been incarcerated at the jail in November 2015 for a federal conspiracy charge, unrelated to the drug trafficking conspiracy involving defendant and Torres, and that defendant was incarcerated in the jail at that same time. The incarcerated individual stated that he interacted with defendant at church and in the courtyard of the jail and that he recalled having overheard a conversation wherein defendant was speaking with his coconspirators, questioning why they were taking a plea deal given that the People did not have any evidence other than what the coconspirators were telling them. The incarcerated individual also recalled a conversation between defendant and one coconspirator wherein he told the coconspirator that the People are "saying I brought a kilo of [c]ocaine to Torres, they didn't have that, I don't know why he saying yes, I don't see...

5 cases
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2022
People v. Cutting
"..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2023
People v. Dennis
"... ... inferences from which a rational [finder of fact] could ... conclude that defendant intended to commit rape and came ... dangerously close to doing so" (People v ... Butkiewicz, 175 A.D.3d at 795 [citations omitted]; ... see generally People v Luna, 206 A.D.3d 1250, 1252 ... [3d Dept 2022]). As to the weight of the evidence, ... "[w]hile there were certainly differences between the ... victim's and defendant's versions of the incident, ... their conflicting testimony presented a classic ... he-said-she-said credibility determination for ... "
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2024
People v. Christie
"...the evidence in a neutral light, we find that the convictions are not against the weight of the evidence" (People v. Luna, 206 A.D.3d 1250, 1253, 170 N.Y.S.3d 323 [3d Dept. 2022] [internal quotation marks, brackets and citation omitted]; see People v. Sharlow, 217 A.D.3d 1120, 1123, 191 N.Y..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2023
People v. Dennis
"...to doing so" ( People v. Butkiewicz, 175 A.D.3d at 795, 107 N.Y.S.3d 181 [citations omitted]; see generally People v. Luna, 206 A.D.3d 1250, 1252, 170 N.Y.S.3d 323 [3d Dept. 2022] ). As to the weight of the evidence, "[w]hile there were certainly differences between the victim's and defenda..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2024
People v. Gaylord
"...marks, brackets and citations omitted], lv denied 38 N.Y.3d 927, 164 N.Y.S.3d 25, 184 N.E.3d 846 [2022]; see People v. Luna, 206 A.D.3d 1250, 1252, 170 N.Y.S.3d 323 [3d Dept. 2022]). As to intent specifically, defendant’s intent to menace his mother may be inferred from the circumstances, i..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2022
People v. Cutting
"..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2023
People v. Dennis
"... ... inferences from which a rational [finder of fact] could ... conclude that defendant intended to commit rape and came ... dangerously close to doing so" (People v ... Butkiewicz, 175 A.D.3d at 795 [citations omitted]; ... see generally People v Luna, 206 A.D.3d 1250, 1252 ... [3d Dept 2022]). As to the weight of the evidence, ... "[w]hile there were certainly differences between the ... victim's and defendant's versions of the incident, ... their conflicting testimony presented a classic ... he-said-she-said credibility determination for ... "
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2024
People v. Christie
"...the evidence in a neutral light, we find that the convictions are not against the weight of the evidence" (People v. Luna, 206 A.D.3d 1250, 1253, 170 N.Y.S.3d 323 [3d Dept. 2022] [internal quotation marks, brackets and citation omitted]; see People v. Sharlow, 217 A.D.3d 1120, 1123, 191 N.Y..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2023
People v. Dennis
"...to doing so" ( People v. Butkiewicz, 175 A.D.3d at 795, 107 N.Y.S.3d 181 [citations omitted]; see generally People v. Luna, 206 A.D.3d 1250, 1252, 170 N.Y.S.3d 323 [3d Dept. 2022] ). As to the weight of the evidence, "[w]hile there were certainly differences between the victim's and defenda..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2024
People v. Gaylord
"...marks, brackets and citations omitted], lv denied 38 N.Y.3d 927, 164 N.Y.S.3d 25, 184 N.E.3d 846 [2022]; see People v. Luna, 206 A.D.3d 1250, 1252, 170 N.Y.S.3d 323 [3d Dept. 2022]). As to intent specifically, defendant’s intent to menace his mother may be inferred from the circumstances, i..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex