Case Law Pepper Constr. Co. v. Palmolive Tower Condominiums, LLC

Pepper Constr. Co. v. Palmolive Tower Condominiums, LLC

Document Cited Authorities (24) Cited in (6) Related

David J. Lloyd and James T. Rohlfing, both of James T. Rohlfing & Associates, P.C., of Chicago, and Peter F. Herzog, of Naperville, for appellant and cross-appellee.

Eric A. Oesterle, of Miller Shakman & Beem LLP, of Chicago, for appellee and cross-appellant.

OPINION

Justice CONNORS delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion.

¶ 1 This appeal involves a dispute between the general contractor for a construction project, Pepper Construction Company (Pepper), and one of its subcontractors, Bourbon Marble, Inc. (Bourbon). Beginning in 2004, Pepper and Bourbon worked on an interior build-out of approximately 96 condominium units in a building owned by Palmolive Tower Condominiums, LLC (Palmolive), and located at 919 North Michigan Avenue in Chicago. At one point, disputes arose and in March 2007, Pepper filed a demand for arbitration against Palmolive. The arbitration proceedings involved Palmolive, Pepper, and Bourbon, along with several other subcontractors of Pepper. The arbitration award was confirmed in the circuit court, and following a global settlement agreement, only issues between Pepper and Bourbon remained. Bourbon attempted to pursue damages against Pepper, but Pepper successfully contended at the summary judgment stage that Bourbon was judicially estopped from pursuing those damages. The remaining issues were resolved at a bench trial, where Pepper was awarded $36,312 in backcharges.

¶ 2 Both parties appeal. Bourbon asserts that: (1) judicial estoppel should have applied to Pepper, but not Bourbon; (2) the judicial estoppel ruling should be reversed because the court misapplied the rules pertaining to judicial admissions; (3) the trial judgment should be reversed because the trial court failed to enforce Pepper's judicial admissions; and (4) the trial court improperly denied Bourbon's petition for attorney fees. For its part, Pepper: (1) maintains that Bourbon's claims were barred by judicial estoppel, res judicata, collateral estoppel, and an agreement between the parties; and (2) asserts that the court improperly granted a directed verdict at trial to Bourbon; and (3) Pepper was the prevailing party and entitled to attorney fees.

¶ 3 I. BACKGROUND
¶ 4 A. Arbitration Proceedings

¶ 5 We first summarize the arbitration proceedings. In its demand and amended demand for arbitration, Pepper asserted that due to certain actions taken by Palmolive, Pepper had incurred significant cost increases and damages. Among other acts, Pepper asserted that Palmolive released construction drawings out of sequence and behind schedule, issued numerous drawing revisions during construction that affected almost every trade on the project, and breached the change order process, which deprived Pepper and its subcontractors of working capital. Pepper also stated that several subcontractors with outstanding claims were joining Pepper in the arbitration proceeding against Palmolive. In response, Palmolive stated that Pepper was responsible for significant delays and had failed to properly manage the work on the project.

¶ 6 Previously, Pepper had entered into a joint interest and liquidating agreement (JILA) with some of its subcontractors. The JILA was signed by the president of Bourbon Tile & Marble, Inc., among other subcontractor entities.1 The JILA stated that the damages and losses suffered by Pepper and the subcontractors were “overwhelmingly caused” by Palmolive and any backcharges Pepper and the subcontractors had against each other were “incidental to and not capable of being calculated until resolution of [Palmolive's] liability is determined by an award in arbitration or settlement of this matter.” The JILA further provided that Pepper and the subcontractors recognized their “common interest in their dispute” with Palmolive and “the mutual benefit of pursuing these interests jointly,” which included “providing a coordinated and joint strategy in the Arbitration.” Under the JILA, each subcontractor agreed to accept as its “sole and exclusive compensation for its...

5 cases
Document | Appellate Court of Illinois – 2021
Pepper Constr. Co. v. Palmolive Tower Condos., LLC
"... 2021 IL App (1st) 200753 194 N.E.3d 991 PEPPER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Plaintiff and Counterdefendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. PALMOLIVE TOWER CONDOMINIUMS, LLC; ABN AMRO Mortgage Corporation, Inc. ; Alzenstein, Neal; Almeida, Jill F.; Almeida, Richard J. ; American Brokers Conduit, f/k/a American Home Mortgage Co.; Anning-Johnson Co. ; Antares Iron and Copper, Inc. ; Asher Brothers Company, Inc., ATG Trust Company, as Trustee of Trust Agreement No ... "
Document | Appellate Court of Illinois – 2018
Hall v. Roberto P. Cipolla & Osf Healthcare Sys.
"... ... Pepper Construction Co. v. Palmolive Tower Condominiums, LLC , ... "
Document | Appellate Court of Illinois – 2016
Phila. Indem. Ins. Co. v. Pace Suburban Bus Serv.
"... ... Ill. S.Ct. R. 341(h)(7) (eff. Feb. 6, 2013); Pepper Construction Co. v. Palmolive Tower Condominiums, LLC, ... "
Document | Appellate Court of Illinois – 2018
In re J.D.
"... ... but also whatever could have been decided."); Pepper Construction Co. v. Palmolive Tower Condominiums, LLC , ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois – 2021
In re Soc'y Ins. Co. COVID-19 Bus. Interruption Protection Ins. Litig.
"... ... ; and (4) resultant injury to the plaintiff." Pepper Const. Co. v. Palmolive Tower Condominiums, LLC , 405 ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | Appellate Court of Illinois – 2021
Pepper Constr. Co. v. Palmolive Tower Condos., LLC
"... 2021 IL App (1st) 200753 194 N.E.3d 991 PEPPER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Plaintiff and Counterdefendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. PALMOLIVE TOWER CONDOMINIUMS, LLC; ABN AMRO Mortgage Corporation, Inc. ; Alzenstein, Neal; Almeida, Jill F.; Almeida, Richard J. ; American Brokers Conduit, f/k/a American Home Mortgage Co.; Anning-Johnson Co. ; Antares Iron and Copper, Inc. ; Asher Brothers Company, Inc., ATG Trust Company, as Trustee of Trust Agreement No ... "
Document | Appellate Court of Illinois – 2018
Hall v. Roberto P. Cipolla & Osf Healthcare Sys.
"... ... Pepper Construction Co. v. Palmolive Tower Condominiums, LLC , ... "
Document | Appellate Court of Illinois – 2016
Phila. Indem. Ins. Co. v. Pace Suburban Bus Serv.
"... ... Ill. S.Ct. R. 341(h)(7) (eff. Feb. 6, 2013); Pepper Construction Co. v. Palmolive Tower Condominiums, LLC, ... "
Document | Appellate Court of Illinois – 2018
In re J.D.
"... ... but also whatever could have been decided."); Pepper Construction Co. v. Palmolive Tower Condominiums, LLC , ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois – 2021
In re Soc'y Ins. Co. COVID-19 Bus. Interruption Protection Ins. Litig.
"... ... ; and (4) resultant injury to the plaintiff." Pepper Const. Co. v. Palmolive Tower Condominiums, LLC , 405 ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex