Sign Up for Vincent AI
R v Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611
5 cases
Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2020 ABQB 547
"...previously responded to this exact allegation in Ubah #4, but also that my record in relation to SRLs shows the opposite: R v Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611 at paras [57] The reasonable, well-informed, observer would also conclude that Mr. Ubah’s allegations are sometimes simply false in law. For e..."
Simon v Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641
"...well-informed person would observe I have already responded to essentially identical and equally ungrounded complaints in R v Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611 at paras 24-36, 50-63, Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2019 ABQB 692 at paras 166-167, and Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limite..."
AR v JU, 2021 ABQB 127
"...in different factual situations from the one at Bar, but setting out the applicable principles nonetheless: R. v. Stephan & Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611, at paras 19-31, 37-49, more generally at 79-85, and, in conclusion, at 95-6; Piikani Nation v. McMullen, 2020 ABQB 87, primarily at paras 1..."
Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2020 ABQB 87
"...for the substantive issue of recusal to proceed. [16] I have had occasion to deal with the law in such allegations in R. v Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611 [Stephan], although not in the same context, nor in the same level of vitriol (the Stephan case was more vitriolic). There, in paras 37 – 49, I o..."
TL (Re), 2022 ABPC 38
"...statements about bias or dishonesty absent of any support cannot displace the presumption of impartiality. At para. 23 of R v Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611, Rooke ACJ The absence of any support for these claims is a first basis to reject that complaint. “ ...standing alone, vague stat..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
5 cases
Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2020 ABQB 547
"...previously responded to this exact allegation in Ubah #4, but also that my record in relation to SRLs shows the opposite: R v Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611 at paras [57] The reasonable, well-informed, observer would also conclude that Mr. Ubah’s allegations are sometimes simply false in law. For e..."
Simon v Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641
"...well-informed person would observe I have already responded to essentially identical and equally ungrounded complaints in R v Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611 at paras 24-36, 50-63, Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2019 ABQB 692 at paras 166-167, and Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limite..."
AR v JU, 2021 ABQB 127
"...in different factual situations from the one at Bar, but setting out the applicable principles nonetheless: R. v. Stephan & Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611, at paras 19-31, 37-49, more generally at 79-85, and, in conclusion, at 95-6; Piikani Nation v. McMullen, 2020 ABQB 87, primarily at paras 1..."
Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2020 ABQB 87
"...for the substantive issue of recusal to proceed. [16] I have had occasion to deal with the law in such allegations in R. v Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611 [Stephan], although not in the same context, nor in the same level of vitriol (the Stephan case was more vitriolic). There, in paras 37 – 49, I o..."
TL (Re), 2022 ABPC 38
"...statements about bias or dishonesty absent of any support cannot displace the presumption of impartiality. At para. 23 of R v Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611, Rooke ACJ The absence of any support for these claims is a first basis to reject that complaint. “ ...standing alone, vague stat..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting