Case Law Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey

Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey

Document Cited Authorities (60) Cited in (200) Related (5)

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

M. Elaine Meckenstock (argued), Deputy Attorney General, Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General of California, Kathleen A. Kenealy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Robert W. Byrne, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Mark W. Poole, Gavin G. McCabe, David A. Zonana, Deputy Attorneys General, San Francisco, CA, for DefendantsAppellants.

Sean H. Donahue (argued) Donahue & Goldberg, LLP, Washington, D.C., Timothy Joseph O'Connor, Environmental Defense Fund, San Francisco, CA; James T.B. Tripp, Environmental Defense Fund, New York, NY; David Richard Pettit, Natural Resources Defense Council, Santa Monica, CA; Joanne Spalding and Devorah Ancel, Sierra Club, San Francisco, CA; Jennifer Kate Rushlow, Conservation Law

Foundation, Boston, MA, for IntervenorDefendantAppellants.

Peter D. Keisler (argued), Roger R. Martella, Jr., Paul Zidlicky, Eric D. McArthur, and Ryan C. Morris, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, D.C.; Kurt E. Blase, Holland & Knight, LLP, Washington, D.C., for PlaintiffsAppellees American Fuels & Petrochemical Manufacturers Association (formerly known as National Petrochemical and Refiners Association), American Trucking Associations, the Center for North American Energy Security, and the Consumer Energy Alliance.

John C. O'Quinn (argued), Michael W. McConnell, Stuart A.C. Drake, Katherine Crytzer, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, D.C.; Howard R. Rubin, Charles H. Knauss, Jennifer Baker Loeb, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Washington, D.C.; Shannon S. Broome, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Oakland, CA; Timothy Jones and John P. Kinsey, Wanger Jones Helsley PC, Fresno, CA, for PlaintiffsAppellees Rocky Mountain Farmers Union; Redwood County Minnesota Corn and Soybeans Growers; Penny Newman Grain, Inc.; Fresno County Farm Bureau; Nisei Farmers League; California Dairy Campaign; Rex Nederend; Growth Energy; and the Renewable Fuels Association.

Jon Bruning, Nebraska Attorney General, Kevin L. Griess and Katherine J. Spohn, Assistant Attorneys General, Lincoln, NE, for Amici Curiae States of Nebraska, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, North Dakota, Ohio, and South Dakota.

Kevin Murray Fong, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Amici Curiae Western States Petroleum Association and Oregon Petroleum Association.

Michael Rhead Enion, Sean Hecht, and Cara Horowitz, Frank G. Wells Environmental Law Clinic, UCLA School of Law, Los Angeles, CA, for Amici Curiae Truman National Security Project and Truman National Security Institute.

Katherine Mayer Mangan, Mayer Mangan, PLC, San Diego, CA, for Amicus Curiae Brazilian Sugarcane Industry Association.

Matthew Dwight Zinn, Shute, Mihaly, and Weinberger, San Francisco, CA, for Amicus Curiae Professors of Environmental Law.

Deborah Ann Sivas, Alicia E. Thesing, Matthew H. Armsby, Daniel Cullenward, Mills Legal Clinic at Stanford Law School, Stanford, CA, for Amici Curiae Ken Caldeira, Ph.D., W. Michael Hanemann, Ph.D., John Harte, Ph.D., Katharine Hayhoe, Ph.D., James C. McWilliams, Ph.D., Michael Oppenheimer, Ph.D., Terry Root, Ph.D., Richard Somerville, Ph.D., John M. Wallace, Ph.D., James Zachos, Ph.D., and William R.L. Anderegg.

Pierre G. Basmaji, Law Office of Pierre G. Basmaji, San Francisco, CA, for Amicus Curiae Ecoshift Consulting, LLC.

Deborah A. Sivas, Alicia E. Thesing, Leah J. Russin, Matthew H. Armsby, David Weiskopf, Mills Legal Clinic at Stanford Law School, Stanford, CA, for Amici Curiae Michael Wang, Ph.D., Thomas L.Theis, Ph.D., Greg Thoma, Ph.D., Matthew Eckelman, Ph.D., and Kimberley Mullins, Ph.D. Candidate.

John R. Kroger, Attorney General of Oregon, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, Denise G. Fjordbeck, Attorney–in–Charge, Civil/Administrative Appeals, Cecil A. Reniche–Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, OR; Douglas F. Gansler, Attorney General of Maryland, Maryland Department of the Environment, Baltimore, MD; Martha Coakley, Attorney General of Massachusetts, Boston, MA; Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of New York, New York, NY; Peter F. Kilmartin, Attorney General of Rhode Island, Providence, RI; William H. Sorrell, Attorney General of Vermont, Montpelier, VT; Robert M. McKenna, Attorney General of Washington, Olympia, WA, for Amici Curiae States of Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington.

Jason A. Levine, John P. Elwood, and Jeremy C. Marwell, Vinson & Elkins LLP, Washington, D.C.; Robin S. Conrad and Rachel L. Brand, National Chamber Litigation Center, Inc., Washington, D.C.; Harry M. Ng and Erik C. Baptist, American Petroleum Institute, Washington, D.C., for Amici Curiae Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and the American Petroleum Institute.

Edward C. Mosca, Legal Counsel, New Hampshire House of Representatives, Concord, NH, for Amici Curiae Peter Bragdon, President of the New Hampshire State Senate, and William L. O'Brien, Speaker of the New Hampshire House of Representatives.

Elbert Lin and Samuel B. Gedge, Wiley Rein LLP, Washington, D.C., for Amicus Curiae Law Professors.

Joshua W. Abbot, Gary E. Marchant, Center for Law, Science & Innovation, Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law, Tempe, AZ, for Amici Curiae Scientific Experts.

Gary J. Smith, Beveridge & Diamond, PC, San Francisco, CA, for Amicus Curiae California Manufacturers & Technology Association.

Tammy W. Klein, Hart Energy, Houston, TX, for Amicus Curiae Hart Energy.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Lawrence J. O'Neill, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. Nos. 1:09–cv–02234–LJO–GSA, 1:10–cv–00163–LJO–DLB.

Before: D.W. NELSON, RONALD M. GOULD,* and MARY H. MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

GOULD, Circuit Judge:

Whether global warming is caused by carbon emissions from our industrialized societies is a question for scientists to ponder. Whether, if such a causal relationship exists, the world can fight or retard global warming by implementing taxes or regulations that deter carbon emissions is a question for economists and politicians to decide. Whether one such regulatory scheme, implemented by the State of California, is constitutional under the United States Constitution's Commerce Clause is the question that we consider in this opinion.

PlaintiffsAppellees Rocky Mountain Farmers' Union et al. (Rocky Mountain) and American Fuels & Petrochemical Manufacturers Association et al. (American Fuels) separately sued DefendantAppellant California Air Resources Board (“CARB”), contending that the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (“Fuel Standard”), Cal.Code Regs. tit. 17, §§ 95480–90 (2011), violated the dormant Commerce Clause and was preempted by Section 211( o) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7545( o), known as the federal Renewable Fuel Standard (“RFS”). In three rulings issued in December 2011, the district court held that the Fuel Standard (1) facially discriminated against out-of-state ethanol; (2) impermissibly engaged in the extraterritorial regulation of ethanol production; (3) discriminatedagainst out-of-state crude oil in purpose and effect; and (4) was not saved by California's preemption waiver in the Clean Air Act. See Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Goldstene (“ Rocky Mountain Ethanol ”), 843 F.Supp.2d 1071, 1090, 1093 (E.D.Cal.2011); Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Goldstene (“ Rocky Mountain Preemption ”), ...

5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — Northern District of California – 2020
Levin Richmond Terminal Corp. v. City of Richmond, Case Nos. 20-cv-01609-YGR
"...the modern era, the Supreme Court has rarely held that statutes violate the extraterritoriality doctrine." Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey , 730 F.3d 1070, 1101 (9th Cir. 2013). The two most prominent cases in which the court has found a violation, Brown-Forman and Healy , involved pr..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Maryland – 2020
Just Puppies, Inc. v. Frosh
"...expense and logistical headaches of transporting dogs directly to consumers are of no moment. See, e.g. , Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey , 730 F.3d 1070, 1092 (9th Cir. 2013) (observing that "the dormant Commerce Clause does not guarantee that [the plaintiffs] may compete on the term..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Northern District of California – 2018
Overton v. Uber Techs., Inc.
"...state action "unjustifiably ... discriminate[s] or burden[s] the interstate flow of articles of commerce." Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey , 730 F.3d 1070, 1087 (9th Cir. 2013) (quoting Or. Waste Sys., Inc. v. Dep't of Envtl. Quality of State of Or. , 511 U.S. 93, 98, 114 S.Ct. 1345, ..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Maryland – 2021
Just Puppies, Inc. v. Frosh
"...Law cannot be said to impose a special burden on interstate commerce.") (emphasis in original); see also Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey , 730 F.3d 1070, 1092 (9th Cir. 2013) (observing that "the dormant Commerce Clause does not guarantee that [the plaintiffs] may compete on the terms..."
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit – 2018
Ass'n for Accessible Medicines v. Frosh
"...the commerce has effects within the State’ ...." (quoting Edgar , 457 U.S. at 642–43, 102 S.Ct. 2629 )); Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey , 730 F.3d 1070, 1103 (9th Cir. 2013) (explaining that "[s]tates may not mandate compliance with their preferred policies in wholly out-of-state tra..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial
5 books and journal articles
Document | Núm. 45-6, June 2015 – 2015
Legal After-Shocks on the Energy Seismograph: Judicial Prohibition of Recent State Regulation and Promotion of Power
"...Illinois Commerce Comm’n v. Federal Energy Regulatory Comm’n (FERC), 721 F.3d 764 (7th Cir. 2013); Rocky Mtn. Farmers Union v. Corey, 730 F.3d 1070, 43 ELR 20216 (9th Cir. 2013). 9. Entergy Nuclear Vt. Yankee, LLC v. Shumlin, 838 F. Supp. 2d 183, 233, 42 ELR 20029 (D. Vt. 2012); Rocky Mtn. ..."
Document | Vol. 50 Núm. 3, June 2020 – 2020
2019 NINTH CIRCUIT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW.
"...(19) U.S. CONST, art. I, [section] 9, cl. 3. (20) U.S. CONST, art. VI, cl. 2. (21) FED. R. CIV. P. 12(c). (22) 730 F.3d 1070 (9th Cir. (23) Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey, 258 F. Supp. 3d 1134 (E.D. Cal. 2017); see also Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey, No. L09-CV-02234-LJO-BAM,..."
Document | Part VIII - Non-Carbon Dioxide Climate Pollutants – 2019
Black Carbon
"...local governments should also work to ensure that diesel truck operators have access to 245. See Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey, 730 F.3d 1070 (9th Cir. 2013) (rejecting dormant Commerce Clause challenge to California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard), reh’g en banc denied , 740 F.3d 507 (..."
Document | Núm. 45-5, May 2015 – 2015
Minimizing Constitutional Risk in State Energy Policy: A Survey of the State of the Law
"...no higher than the lowest prices charged to wholesalers anywhere in the United States that month). 59. Rocky Mtn. Farmers Union v. Corey, 730 F.3d 1070, 1101, 43 ELR 20216 (9th Cir. 2013) (“In the modern era, the Supreme Court has rarely held that statutes violate the extraterritoriality do..."
Document | Núm. 47-5, May 2017 – 2017
An Empirical Look at Preliminary Injunctions in Challenges Under Environmental Protection Laws
"...Cir. 2012) Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Goldstene Granted; All four met 843 F. Supp. 2d 1071 (E.D. Cal. 2011) Vacated and remanded 730 F.3d 1070 (9th Cir. 2013) Cloud Found. v. U.S. Bureau of Land Mgmt. Denied; None met 802 F. Supp. 2d 1192 (D. Nev. 2011) Rosemere Neighborhood Ass’n v. C..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial
5 firm's commentaries
Document | JD Supra United States – 2020
Marine Plastic Pollution: How Global Extended Producer Responsibility Can Help
"...law that prohibited the possession, sale, trade, or distribution of shark fins in California); Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey, 730 F.3d 1070, 43 ELR 20216 (9th Cir. 2013) (upholding California law that encouraged use of certain fuels); Association des Eleveurs de Canards et d’Oies du..."
Document | JD Supra United States – 2016
Constitutional Limits to Greenhouse Gas Regulation: 8th Circuit Relies on the Dormant Commerce Clause to Reject Minnesota’s GHG Limits on Imported Power
"...from sources within its borders,” thereby conflicting with the regulatory scheme of the CAA. Id. [21] Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey, 730 F.3d 1070 (9th Cir. 2013), rehearing denied, 740 F.3d 507 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 2884 (2014). [22] Id. at 1080. [23] Id. at 1080 n.1..."
Document | JD Supra United States – 2014
US Supreme Court Denied Certiorari Regarding the Constitutionality of California's Low Carbon Fuel Standard
"...state court decision. In the meantime, the LCFS remains in force. Joshua Bledsoe Jean-Philippe Brisson Michael Dreibelbis Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey. The Court’s decision effectively affirms the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s recent ruling that the LCFS does not faciall..."
Document | Mondaq United States – 2014
Legal Challenges To California GHG Regulatory Programs
"...generates in excess of the annual emissions cap, as measured by the carbon intensity score. In Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Goldstene, 730 F.3d 1070 (9th Cir. 2013), the Ninth Circuit held that the LCFS does not facially discriminate against interstate commerce or regulate extraterritori..."
Document | Mondaq United States – 2015
Tenth Circuit Rejects Constitutional Challenge To Colorado's Renewable Energy Mandate
"...Clause challenge to a state law regulating energy. For instance, in 2013, the Ninth Circuit in Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey, 730 F.3d 1070, reversed a district court ruling and held that California's Low Carbon Fuel Standard regulations didn't facially violate the Commerce Clause. ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 books and journal articles
Document | Núm. 45-6, June 2015 – 2015
Legal After-Shocks on the Energy Seismograph: Judicial Prohibition of Recent State Regulation and Promotion of Power
"...Illinois Commerce Comm’n v. Federal Energy Regulatory Comm’n (FERC), 721 F.3d 764 (7th Cir. 2013); Rocky Mtn. Farmers Union v. Corey, 730 F.3d 1070, 43 ELR 20216 (9th Cir. 2013). 9. Entergy Nuclear Vt. Yankee, LLC v. Shumlin, 838 F. Supp. 2d 183, 233, 42 ELR 20029 (D. Vt. 2012); Rocky Mtn. ..."
Document | Vol. 50 Núm. 3, June 2020 – 2020
2019 NINTH CIRCUIT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW.
"...(19) U.S. CONST, art. I, [section] 9, cl. 3. (20) U.S. CONST, art. VI, cl. 2. (21) FED. R. CIV. P. 12(c). (22) 730 F.3d 1070 (9th Cir. (23) Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey, 258 F. Supp. 3d 1134 (E.D. Cal. 2017); see also Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey, No. L09-CV-02234-LJO-BAM,..."
Document | Part VIII - Non-Carbon Dioxide Climate Pollutants – 2019
Black Carbon
"...local governments should also work to ensure that diesel truck operators have access to 245. See Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey, 730 F.3d 1070 (9th Cir. 2013) (rejecting dormant Commerce Clause challenge to California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard), reh’g en banc denied , 740 F.3d 507 (..."
Document | Núm. 45-5, May 2015 – 2015
Minimizing Constitutional Risk in State Energy Policy: A Survey of the State of the Law
"...no higher than the lowest prices charged to wholesalers anywhere in the United States that month). 59. Rocky Mtn. Farmers Union v. Corey, 730 F.3d 1070, 1101, 43 ELR 20216 (9th Cir. 2013) (“In the modern era, the Supreme Court has rarely held that statutes violate the extraterritoriality do..."
Document | Núm. 47-5, May 2017 – 2017
An Empirical Look at Preliminary Injunctions in Challenges Under Environmental Protection Laws
"...Cir. 2012) Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Goldstene Granted; All four met 843 F. Supp. 2d 1071 (E.D. Cal. 2011) Vacated and remanded 730 F.3d 1070 (9th Cir. 2013) Cloud Found. v. U.S. Bureau of Land Mgmt. Denied; None met 802 F. Supp. 2d 1192 (D. Nev. 2011) Rosemere Neighborhood Ass’n v. C..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — Northern District of California – 2020
Levin Richmond Terminal Corp. v. City of Richmond, Case Nos. 20-cv-01609-YGR
"...the modern era, the Supreme Court has rarely held that statutes violate the extraterritoriality doctrine." Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey , 730 F.3d 1070, 1101 (9th Cir. 2013). The two most prominent cases in which the court has found a violation, Brown-Forman and Healy , involved pr..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Maryland – 2020
Just Puppies, Inc. v. Frosh
"...expense and logistical headaches of transporting dogs directly to consumers are of no moment. See, e.g. , Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey , 730 F.3d 1070, 1092 (9th Cir. 2013) (observing that "the dormant Commerce Clause does not guarantee that [the plaintiffs] may compete on the term..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Northern District of California – 2018
Overton v. Uber Techs., Inc.
"...state action "unjustifiably ... discriminate[s] or burden[s] the interstate flow of articles of commerce." Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey , 730 F.3d 1070, 1087 (9th Cir. 2013) (quoting Or. Waste Sys., Inc. v. Dep't of Envtl. Quality of State of Or. , 511 U.S. 93, 98, 114 S.Ct. 1345, ..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Maryland – 2021
Just Puppies, Inc. v. Frosh
"...Law cannot be said to impose a special burden on interstate commerce.") (emphasis in original); see also Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey , 730 F.3d 1070, 1092 (9th Cir. 2013) (observing that "the dormant Commerce Clause does not guarantee that [the plaintiffs] may compete on the terms..."
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit – 2018
Ass'n for Accessible Medicines v. Frosh
"...the commerce has effects within the State’ ...." (quoting Edgar , 457 U.S. at 642–43, 102 S.Ct. 2629 )); Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey , 730 F.3d 1070, 1103 (9th Cir. 2013) (explaining that "[s]tates may not mandate compliance with their preferred policies in wholly out-of-state tra..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 firm's commentaries
Document | JD Supra United States – 2020
Marine Plastic Pollution: How Global Extended Producer Responsibility Can Help
"...law that prohibited the possession, sale, trade, or distribution of shark fins in California); Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey, 730 F.3d 1070, 43 ELR 20216 (9th Cir. 2013) (upholding California law that encouraged use of certain fuels); Association des Eleveurs de Canards et d’Oies du..."
Document | JD Supra United States – 2016
Constitutional Limits to Greenhouse Gas Regulation: 8th Circuit Relies on the Dormant Commerce Clause to Reject Minnesota’s GHG Limits on Imported Power
"...from sources within its borders,” thereby conflicting with the regulatory scheme of the CAA. Id. [21] Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey, 730 F.3d 1070 (9th Cir. 2013), rehearing denied, 740 F.3d 507 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 2884 (2014). [22] Id. at 1080. [23] Id. at 1080 n.1..."
Document | JD Supra United States – 2014
US Supreme Court Denied Certiorari Regarding the Constitutionality of California's Low Carbon Fuel Standard
"...state court decision. In the meantime, the LCFS remains in force. Joshua Bledsoe Jean-Philippe Brisson Michael Dreibelbis Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey. The Court’s decision effectively affirms the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s recent ruling that the LCFS does not faciall..."
Document | Mondaq United States – 2014
Legal Challenges To California GHG Regulatory Programs
"...generates in excess of the annual emissions cap, as measured by the carbon intensity score. In Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Goldstene, 730 F.3d 1070 (9th Cir. 2013), the Ninth Circuit held that the LCFS does not facially discriminate against interstate commerce or regulate extraterritori..."
Document | Mondaq United States – 2015
Tenth Circuit Rejects Constitutional Challenge To Colorado's Renewable Energy Mandate
"...Clause challenge to a state law regulating energy. For instance, in 2013, the Ninth Circuit in Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey, 730 F.3d 1070, reversed a district court ruling and held that California's Low Carbon Fuel Standard regulations didn't facially violate the Commerce Clause. ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial